Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative Performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Equations for Estimating GFR Levels Above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2

Open access
Stevens, Lesley A., Schmid, Christopher H., Greene, Tom, Zhang, Yaping (Lucy), Beck, Gerald J., Froissart, Marc, Hamm, Lee L., Lewis, Julia B., Mauer, Michael, Navis, Gerjan J., Steffes, Michael W., Eggers, Paul W., Coresh, Josef, Levey, Andrew S.·2010·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

Background The MDRD Study equation underestimates measured GFR at levels greater than 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, with variable accuracy among subgroups; consequently estimated GFR (eGFR) ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 is not reported by clinical laboratories. Here, the performance of a more accurate GFR estimating equation, the CKD-EPI equation, is reported by level of GFR and clinical characteristics. Study Design Test of diagnostic accuracy Setting and Participants Pooled dataset of 3896 people from 16 studies with measured GFR (not used for development of either equation). Subgroups were defined by eGFR, age, sex, race, diabetes, prior solid organ transplant, and body mass index. Index Tests eGFR from the CKD-EPI and MDRD Study equations and standardized serum creatinine Reference Test Measured GFR using urinary or plasma clearance of exogenous filtration markers Results Mean (SD) measured GFR was 68 (36) ml/min/1.73 m2. For eGFR less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, both equations have similar bias (median difference compared to measured GFR). For eGFR between 30-59 ml/min/1.73 m2, bias was reduced from 4.9 to 2.1 ml/min/1.73 m2 (57% improvement). For eGFR between 60-89 ml/min/1.73 m2, bias was reduced from 11.9 to 4.2 ml/min/1.73 m2 (61 % improvement). For eGFR between 90-119 ml/min/1.73 m2, bias was reduced from 10.0 to 1.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 (75% improvement). Similar or improved performance was noted for most subgroups with eGFR < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2, other than BMI less than 20 kg/m2, with greater variation noted for some subgroups with eGFR ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m2. Limitations Limited number of elderly people and racial and ethnic minorities with measured GFR. Conclusions The CKD-EPI equation is more accurate than the MDRD Study equation overall and across most subgroups. In contrast to the MDRD Study equation, eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 can be reported using the CKD-EPI equation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.026

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Stevens, L. A., Schmid, C. H., Greene, T., Zhang, Y. (., Beck, G. J., Froissart, M., Hamm, L. L., Lewis, J. B., Mauer, M., Navis, G. J., Steffes, M. W., Eggers, P. W., Coresh, J., & Levey, A. S.
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-09
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
486-495
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077093911
Cited by
600
References
5
FWCI
34.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Equations for Estimating GFR Levels Above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.026
The paper
Stevens, L. A., Schmid, C. H., Greene, T., Zhang, Y. (., Beck, G. J., Froissart, M., Hamm, L. L., Lewis, J. B., Mauer, M., Navis, G. J., Steffes, M. W., Eggers, P. W., Coresh, J., & Levey, A. S. (2010). Comparative Performance of the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Equations for Estimating GFR Levels Above 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.03.026

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.