Cited by 11Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementCentral Venous Catheters and HemodialysisParathyroid Disorders and Treatments

Routine Kt/V and Normalized Protein Nitrogen Appearance Rate Determined From Conductivity Access Clearance With Infrequent Postdialysis Serum Urea Nitrogen Measurements

Raimann, Jochen G., Ye, Xiaoling, Kotanko, Peter, Daugirdas, John T.·2020·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

Rationale & objectives Conventional monitoring of hemodialysis dose is implemented using urea kinetic modeling based on single-pool Kt/V, which requires both pre- and postdialysis serum urea nitrogen (SUN) measurements. We compared this conventional approach to one in which Kt/V is calculated using conductivity clearance, thereby reducing the need for regular postdialysis SUN measurements. Study design Comparative study of 2 diagnostic tests. Setting & participants Prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 2 years for whom both urea reduction ratio (URR) and average conductivity clearance (Kecn) were measured. Tests compared During the initial 8 months (baseline interval), average Kecn and URR were used to calculate a median patient-specific, modeled, calibration solute distribution volume (Vcal). During months 9 to 16 (period 1) and 17 to 24 (period 2), Kt/V was conventionally computed using URR and also by a new method using Vcal and Kecn without postdialysis SUN values. We examined the percentage error between these 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. Outcomes Concordance between the 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. Results Among 1,093 patients, mean individual-level median single-pool Kt/V values derived using the conventional method during the baseline interval, period 1, and period 2 were 1.62±0.24 (SD), 1.66±0.24, and 1.67±0.24, respectively. During periods 1 and 2, patient-level median Kt/V values derived using Kecn were 1.64±0.24 and 1.65±0.24, resp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.12.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raimann, J. G., Ye, X., Kotanko, P., & Daugirdas, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Renal Research Institute (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Daugirdas, John T.
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
76
Issue
1
Pages
22-31
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3013812878
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
addendum (2020-11-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Renal Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Kt/V, urea kinetic modeling, blood urea nitrogen, urea reduction ratio, maintenance hemodialysis, dialysis adequacy, method concordance, measurement error, in-center hemodialysis, treatment interruption
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review