Routine Kt/V and Normalized Protein Nitrogen Appearance Rate Determined From Conductivity Access Clearance With Infrequent Postdialysis Serum Urea Nitrogen Measurements
Abstract
Rationale & objectives Conventional monitoring of hemodialysis dose is implemented using urea kinetic modeling based on single-pool Kt/V, which requires both pre- and postdialysis serum urea nitrogen (SUN) measurements. We compared this conventional approach to one in which Kt/V is calculated using conductivity clearance, thereby reducing the need for regular postdialysis SUN measurements. Study design Comparative study of 2 diagnostic tests. Setting & participants Prevalent patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis for at least 2 years for whom both urea reduction ratio (URR) and average conductivity clearance (Kecn) were measured. Tests compared During the initial 8 months (baseline interval), average Kecn and URR were used to calculate a median patient-specific, modeled, calibration solute distribution volume (Vcal). During months 9 to 16 (period 1) and 17 to 24 (period 2), Kt/V was conventionally computed using URR and also by a new method using Vcal and Kecn without postdialysis SUN values. We examined the percentage error between these 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. Outcomes Concordance between the 2 methods of calculating Kt/V. Results Among 1,093 patients, mean individual-level median single-pool Kt/V values derived using the conventional method during the baseline interval, period 1, and period 2 were 1.62±0.24 (SD), 1.66±0.24, and 1.67±0.24, respectively. During periods 1 and 2, patient-level median Kt/V values derived using Kecn were 1.64±0.24 and 1.65±0.24, resp…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Normal thresholds for Kt/V are typically above 1.20, and for URR, above 65%.
“Normal thresholds for Kt/V are typically above 1.20, and for URR, above 65%.27”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusofonia, de Souza Maciel Ferreira, J. E., Freire de Sousa, D., University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusofonia, Pessoa Moreira, R., University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusofonia, Cândido Morais, H. C., University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusofonia, Moreira Barros, L., University of International Integration of Afro-Brazilian Lusofonia, et al. (2025) · Investigación y Educación en Enfermería · doi:10.17533/udea.iee.v43n3e12
- Authors
- Raimann, J. G., Ye, X., Kotanko, P., & Daugirdas, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Renal Research Institute (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Daugirdas, John T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Kidney Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-07
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-31
- ISSN
- 0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3013812878
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- addendum (2020-11-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Renal Research Institute
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- Kt/V, urea kinetic modeling, blood urea nitrogen, urea reduction ratio, maintenance hemodialysis, dialysis adequacy, method concordance, measurement error, in-center hemodialysis, treatment interruption
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Renal Dialysis, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review