Mucosal Healing in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From a Norwegian Population-Based Cohort
Abstract
Background and aims Mucosal healing (MH) in inflammatory bowel disease may be an important sign of efficacy of treatment and a prognostic marker of long-term disease. The aim of the study was to examine both the possible predictors of mucosal healing and the impact of healing on subsequent course of disease.Methods In 740 incident patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) between 1990 and 1994 (before biologic therapy was available), demographics and symptoms were recorded. Clinical and endoscopic evaluations were done at baseline before treatment and repeated after 1 and 5 years in 495 patients.Results In UC patients, education longer than 12 years and extensive disease at diagnosis were significant predictors of MH after 1 year (adjusted P = .004 and P = .02, respectively). MH was significantly associated with a low risk of future colectomy (P = .02). In patients with CD, fever at diagnosis and medical treatment without steroids were significant predictors for MH (adjusted P = .03 and P = .01, respectively). MH was significantly associated with less inflammation after 5 years (P = .02), decreased future steroid treatment (P = .02).Conclusions Several factors predicted subsequent MH. Education as predictor may implicate the importance of coping, compliance, or lifestyle. MH after 1 year of treatment is predictive of reduced subsequent disease activity and decreased need for active treatment. The present results give further strength to the use of mucosal healing as a clinical indicator and treatment goal in inflammatory bowel disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consideration of endoscopic inflammation and healing as an important therapeutic target has only recently emerged as a potentially important goal.
“Consideration of endoscopic inflammation and healing as an important therapeutic target has only recently emerged as a potentially important goal 38 .”
From The Manitoba IBD Index: Evidence for a New and Simple Indicator of IBD Activity (2009) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 1,121
- Authors
- Frøslie, K. F., Jahnsen, J., Moum, B. A., & Vatn, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Vatn, Morten H.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 412-422
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2059127937
- Cited by
- 1,121
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 70 · 2012: 69
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Microscopic Colitis
- Keywords
- mucosal healing, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, disease activity, colectomy, corticosteroid therapy, endoscopic inflammation, prognostic factors
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Colectomy, Colitis, Ulcerative, Crohn Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gastrointestinal Agents, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Population Surveillance, Prospective Studies, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Wound Healing, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review