Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 745

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Open access
Marrero, Jorge A., Feng, Ziding, Wang, Yinghui, Nguyen, Mindie H., Befeler, Alex S., Roberts, Lewis R., Reddy, K. Rajender, Harnois, Denise, Llovet, Josep M., Normolle, Daniel, Dalhgren, Jackie, Chia, David, Lok, Anna S., Wagner, Paul D., Srivastava, Sudhir, Schwartz, Myron·2009·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background and Aims Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is widely used as a surveillance test for Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among patients with cirrhosis. Des-gamma carboxy-prothrombin (DCP) and lectin-bound AFP (AFP-L3) are potential surveillance tests for HCC. The aims of this study were to determine performance of DCP and AFP-L3 for the diagnosis of early HCC, whether they complement AFP, and what factors affect DCP, AFP-L3 or AFP levels. Methods We conducted a large phase 2 biomarker case-control study in 7 academic medical centers in the United States. Controls were patients with compensated cirrhosis and cases were patients with HCC. AFP, DCP and AFP-L3 levels were measured blinded to clinical data in a central reference laboratory. Results A total of 836 patients were enrolled, 417 (50%) were cirrhosis controls and 419 (50%) were HCC cases, of which 208 (49.6%) had early stage HCC (n=77 very early, n=131 early). AFP had the best area under the ROC curve (0.80, 95%CI: 0.77–0.84) followed by DCP (0.72, 95%CI: 0.68–0.77) and AFP-L3% (0.66, 95%CI: 0.62–0.70) for early stage HCC. The optimal AFP cutoff value was 10.9 ng/ml leading to a sensitivity of 66%. When only those with very early HCC were evaluated, the AUC for AFP was 0.78 (95%CI: 0.72–0.85) leading to a sensitivity of 65% at the same cutoff. Conclusion AFP was more sensitive than DCP and AFP-L3 for the diagnosis of early and very early stage HCC at a new cutoff of 10.9 ng/mL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 745

Metadata

Authors
Marrero, J. A., Feng, Z., Wang, Y., Nguyen, M. H., Befeler, A. S., Roberts, L. R., Reddy, K. R., Harnois, D., Llovet, J. M., Normolle, D., Dalhgren, J., Chia, D., Lok, A. S., Wagner, P. D., Srivastava, S., & Schwartz, M.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
137
Issue
1
Pages
110-118
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995180061
Cited by
745
References
24
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005
The paper
Marrero, J. A., Feng, Z., Wang, Y., Nguyen, M. H., Befeler, A. S., Roberts, L. R., Reddy, K. R., Harnois, D., Llovet, J. M., Normolle, D., Dalhgren, J., Chia, D., Lok, A. S., Wagner, P. D., Srivastava, S., & Schwartz, M. (2009). α-Fetoprotein, Des-γ Carboxyprothrombin, and Lectin-Bound α-Fetoprotein in Early Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.