Cited by 356Liver physiology and pathologyTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Liver Progenitor Cells Yield Functional Hepatocytes in Response to Chronic Liver Injury in Mice

Open access
Español–Suñer, Regina, Carpentier, Rodolphe, Van Hul, Noémi, Legry, Vanessa, Achouri, Younes, Cordi, Sabine, Jacquemin, Patrick, Lemaigre, Frédéric +1 more·2012·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Self-renewal of mature hepatocytes promotes homeostasis and regeneration of adult liver. However, recent studies have indicated that liver progenitor cells (LPC) could give rise to hepatic epithelial cells during normal turnover of the liver and after acute injury. We investigated the capacity of LPC to differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo and contribute to liver regeneration.Methods We performed lineage tracing experiments, using mice that express tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under control of osteopontin regulatory region crossed with yelow fluorescent protein reporter mice, to follow the fate of LPC and biliary cells. Adult mice received partial (two-thirds) hepatectomy, acute or chronic administration of carbon tetrachloride (CCl(4)), choline-deficient diet supplemented with ethionine, or 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine diet.Results LPC and/or biliary cells generated 0.78% and 2.45% of hepatocytes during and upon recovery of mice from liver injury, respectively. Repopulation efficiency by LPC and/or biliary cells increased when extracellular matrix and laminin deposition were reduced. The newly formed hepatocytes integrated into hepatic cords, formed biliary canaliculi, expressed hepato-specific enzymes, accumulated glycogen, and proliferated in response to partial hepatectomy, as neighboring native hepatocytes. By contrast, LPC did not contribute to hepatocyte regeneration during normal liver homeostasis, in response to surgical or toxic loss of liver mass, during chronic liver injury (CCl(4)-induced), or during ductular reactions.Conclusions LPC or biliary cells terminally differentiate into functional hepatocytes in mice with liver injury.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.024

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When hepatocyte-mediated regeneration is impaired, following chronic injury and induction of hepatocyte senescence, BECs can transdifferentiate into zone 1 hepatocytes which subsequently proliferate and repopulate other lobular zones.

    “When hepatocyte-mediated regeneration is impaired, following chronic injury and induction of hepatocyte senescence, BECs can transdifferentiate into zone 1 hepatocytes which subsequentially proliferate and repopulate other lobular zones[112], [113], [114], [115], [116], [117], [118]”

    From Distinct hepatocyte identities in liver homeostasis and regeneration (2023) · cites this paper as [114]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that LPC and biliary-cell precursors produced a small proportion of hepatocytes after CDE-induced chronic injury. The section “LPC-Derived Hepatocytes Are Fully Differentiated” (page unavailable) locates those cells in zones 1 and 2 and shows that they proliferated after partial hepatectomy. Our copy does not establish that hepatocyte senescence triggered this process or that the new hepatocytes subsequently proliferated to repopulate other lobular zones. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent studies have demonstrated that HPCs arise within the liver, engraft the parenchyma, and may have some differentiation capacity but did not regenerate significant quantities of liver parenchyma.

    “These studies demonstrated that HPCs arise within the liver, engraft the parenchyma14 and may have some differentiation capacity but did not regenerate significant quantities of liver parenchyma11-13.”
  • The liver repopulating capacity of these HPCs in healthy liver is probably negligible.

    “Furthermore, the liver repopulating capacity of these cells in a healthy liver is likely insignificant- previous lineage tracing studies have shown no contribution from HPCs to hepatocytes in healthy liver11,44 and hepatocytes are the primary source of regeneration in normal liver homeostasis3.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 356

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Grisham J, Thorgeirsson S. Liver stem cells. In: Potten CS, ed. Stem cells. London: Academic Press, 1997:233-282.
  2. Van Hul NK, Abarca-Quinones J, Sempoux C, et al. Relation be- tween liver progenitor cell expansion and extracellular matrix de- position in a CDE-induced murine model of chronic liver injury. Hepatology 2009;49:1625-1635.

Authors
Español–Suñer, R., Carpentier, R., Van Hul, N., Legry, V., Achouri, Y., Cordi, S., Jacquemin, P., Lemaigre, F., & Leclercq, I. A.
Affiliations
  • de Duve Institute (BE)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Corresponding author
Leclercq, Isabelle A.
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
143
Issue
6
Pages
1564-1575.e7
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025966264
Cited by
356
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 28
FWCI
19.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fédération Wallonie-Bruxelles
  • Innoviris
  • Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (P6/20)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
liver progenitor cells, hepatocyte differentiation, liver regeneration, chronic liver injury, partial hepatectomy, carbon tetrachloride, choline-deficient ethionine diet, 3,5-diethoxycarbonyl-1,4-dihydrocollidine, lineage tracing, osteopontin, extracellular matrix, laminin, ductular reaction
MeSH terms
Animals, Carbon Tetrachloride, Cell Differentiation, Choline Deficiency, Female, Hepatectomy, Homeostasis, Liver, Liver Regeneration, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Stem Cells, Hepatocytes, Models, Animal, Mice, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review