The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Polyp Detection for Colonoscopy: Initial Experience
Open accessAbstract
The adenoma detection rate is an established quality indicator for colonoscopy. For instance, a 1% increase in the adenoma detection rate was associated with a 3% decrease in interval colorectal cancer incidence.1 However, a previous meta-analysis showed that approximately 26% of neoplastic diminutive polyps were missed in single colonoscopy.2 Two factors are considered to affect this rate; one is blind spots and the other is human error. The first factor could be solved using a wide-angle scope or distal attachments, but human error is not easily overcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Spatiotemporal Features with 3D Convolutional Networks
Tran, D., Bourdev, L., Fergus, R., Torresani, L., & Paluri, M. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.510 · Cited by 9,593
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Fernández-Esparrach, G., Bernal, J., López-Cerón, M., Córdova, H., Sánchez-Montes, C., Rodríguez de Miguel, C., & Sánchez, F. (2016) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0042-108434 · Cited by 146
Cited by
Wang, P., Berzin, T. M., Glissen Brown, J. R., Bharadwaj, S., Becq, A., Xiao, X., Liu, P., Li, L., Song, Y., Zhang, D., et al. (2019) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317500 · Cited by 865
Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial
Repici, A., Badalamenti, M., Maselli, R., Correale, L., Radaelli, F., Rondonotti, E., Ferrara, E., Spadaccini, M., Alkandari, A., Fugazza, A., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 · Cited by 646
Signaling pathways involved in colorectal cancer: pathogenesis and targeted therapy
Li, Q., Geng, S., Luo, H., Wang, W., Mo, Y.-Q., Luo, Q., Wang, L., Song, G.-B., Sheng, J.-P., & Xu, B. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01953-7 · Cited by 546
Application of artificial intelligence in gastroenterology
Yang, Y. J., & Bang, C. S. (2019) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v25.i14.1666 · Cited by 263
Xu, H., Tang, R. S. Y., Lam, T. Y. T., Zhao, G., Lau, J. Y. W., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Rong, L., Xu, W., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Misawa, M., Kudo, S.-E., Mori, Y., Cho, T., Kataoka, S., Yamauchi, A., Ogawa, Y., Maeda, Y., Takeda, K., Ichimasa, K., Nakamura, H., Yagawa, Y., Toyoshima, N., Ogata, N., Kudo, T., Hisayuki, T., Hayashi, T., Wakamura, K., Baba, T., Ishida, F., Itoh, H., Roth, H., Oda, M., & Mori, K.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2027-2029.e3
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2797069348
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
