The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Colonoscopy examination does not always detect colorectal cancer (CRC)- some patients develop CRC after negative findings from an examination. When this occurs before the next recommended examination, it is called interval cancer. From a colonoscopy quality assurance perspective, that term is too restrictive, so the term post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) was created in 2010. However, PCCRC definitions and methods for calculating rates vary among studies, making it impossible to compare results. We aimed to standardize the terminology, identification, analysis, and reporting of PCCRCs and CRCs detected after other whole-colon imaging evaluations (post-imaging colorectal cancers [PICRCs]). METHODS A 20-member international team of gastroenterologists, pathologists, and epidemiologists; a radiologist; and a non-medical professional met to formulate a series of recommendations, standardize definitions and categories (to align with interval cancer terminology), develop an algorithm to determine most-plausible etiologies, and develop standardized methodology to calculate rates of PCCRC and PICRC. The team followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. A literature review provided 401 articles to support proposed statements; evidence was rated using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system. The statements were voted on anonymously by team members, using a modified Delphi approach. RESULTS The team produced 21 statements that provide comprehensive guidance on PCCRCs and PICRCs. The statements present standardized definitions and terms, as well as methods for qualitative review, determination of etiology, calculation of PCCRC rates, and non-colonoscopic imaging of the colon. CONCLUSIONS A 20-member international team has provided standardized methods for analysis of etiologies of PCCRCs and PICRCs and defines its use as a quality indicator. The team provides recommendations for clinicians, organizations, researchers, policy makers, and patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System
Bosman, F. T. (2010) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,041
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care
Brouwers, M. C., Kho, M. E., Browman, G. P., Burgers, J. S., Cluzeau, F., Feder, G., Fervers, B., Graham, I. D., Grimshaw, J., Hanna, S. E., et al. (2010) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.090449 · Cited by 3,790
Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death
Corley, D. A., Jensen, C. D., Marks, A. R., Zhao, W. K., Lee, J. K., Doubeni, C. A., Zauber, A. G., de Boer, J., Fireman, B. H., Schottinger, J. E., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1309086 · Cited by 2,270
Self-citationQuality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
Kaminski, M. F., Regula, J., Kraszewska, E., Polkowski, M., Wojciechowska, U., Didkowska, J., Zwierko, M., Rupinski, M., Nowacki, M. P., & Butruk, E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907667 · Cited by 2,010
Self-citationLieberman, D. A., Rex, D. K., Winawer, S. J., Giardiello, F. M., Johnson, D. A., & Levin, T. R. (2012) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001 · Cited by 1,892
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies
Rex, D., Cutler, C., Lemmel, G., Rahmani, E., Clark, D., Helper, D., Lehman, G., & Mark, D. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0016-5085(97)70214-2 · Cited by 1,553
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, B. M., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.385 · Cited by 1,401
Polyp Miss Rate Determined by Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review
van Rijn, J. C., Reitsma, J. B., Stoker, J., Bossuyt, P. M., van Deventer, S. J., & Dekker, E. (2006) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x · Cited by 1,344
Self-citation
Cited by
Dekker, E., Tanis, P. J., Vleugels, J. L. A., Kasi, P. M., & Wallace, M. B. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32319-0 · Cited by 4,974
Self-citationACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021
Shaukat, A., Kahi, C. J., Burke, C. A., Rabeneck, L., Sauer, B. G., & Rex, D. K. (2021) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122 · Cited by 853
Self-citationImpact of artificial intelligence on miss rate of colorectal neoplasia
Wallace, M. B., Sharma, P., Bhandari, P., East, J., Antonelli, G., Lorenzetti, R., Vieth, M., Speranza, I., Spadaccini, M., Desai, M., et al. (2022) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.007 · Cited by 273
Optimizing the quality of colorectal cancer screening worldwide
Kaminski, M. F., Robertson, D. J., Senore, C., & Rex, D. K. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.026 · Cited by 171
Self-citationColonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines
Saito, Y., Oka, S., Kawamura, T., Shimoda, R., Sekiguchi, M., Tamai, N., Hotta, K., Matsuda, T., Misawa, M., Tanaka, S., et al. (2021) · Digestive Endoscopy · doi:10.1111/den.13972 · Cited by 170
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rutter, M. D., Beintaris, I., Valori, R., Chiu, H. M., Corley, D. A., Cuatrecasas, M., Dekker, E., Forsberg, A., Gore-Booth, J., Haug, U., Kaminski, M. F., Matsuda, T., Meijer, G. A., Morris, E., Plumb, A. A., Rabeneck, L., Robertson, D. J., Schoen, R. E., Singh, H., Tinmouth, J., Young, G. P., & Sanduleanu, S.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 909-925.e3
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811296422
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038
- The paper
- Rutter, M. D., Beintaris, I., Valori, R., Chiu, H. M., Corley, D. A., Cuatrecasas, M., Dekker, E., Forsberg, A., Gore-Booth, J., Haug, U., Kaminski, M. F., Matsuda, T., Meijer, G. A., Morris, E., Plumb, A. A., Rabeneck, L., Robertson, D. J., Schoen, R. E., Singh, H., . . . Sanduleanu, S. (2018). World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
