Cited by 124Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentLiver Diseases and ImmunityLiver physiology and pathology

Factors associated with histologic response in adult patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Open access
Loomba, Rohit, Sanyal, Arun J., Kowdley, Kris V., Terrault, Norah, Chalasani, Naga P., Abdelmalek, Manal F., McCullough, Arthur J., Shringarpure, Reshma +6 more·2019·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a leading cause of liver transplantation, and many trials are underway to evaluate potential therapies. The farnesoid X receptor ligand obeticholic acid in the NASH treatment trial evaluated the effects of obeticholic acid vs placebo on histologic response (defined as decrease in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score [NAS] by ≥2, with no worsening of fibrosis); 45% of patients had a histologic response to obeticholic acid (25 mg), and 21% had a response to placebo (P < .01). We performed a secondary analysis of data from this trial to identify clinical parameters associated with a histologic response.Methods We used a logistic regression model with a stepwise selection procedure to identify baseline and early on-treatment factors associated with a histologic response at 72 weeks. Baseline demographics, liver histology, medical history, concomitant medications, cardiometabolic parameters, and serum biochemistry, as well as the changes over the course of the trial (at weeks 12 and 24), were evaluated as potential predictors of a histologic response. The model was cross-validated by a jackknife method, and performance was evaluated with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.Results The logistic regression model found that obeticholic acid treatment, baseline NAS > 5, baseline triglyceride level ≤ 154 mg/dL, baseline international normalized ratio ≤ 1, baseline aspartate aminotransferase level ≤ 49 U/L, and a decrease in alanine aminotransferase level at week 24 by 17 U/L or more, to be significantly associated with histologic response (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-0.89; P < .0001).Conclusions In a secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial of obeticholic acid in patients with NASH, we identified routine clinical and laboratory parameters during the first 24 weeks of treatment (such as baseline NAS, triglyceride levels, and a decrease in alanine aminotransferase level) to significantly associate with histologic markers of response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.09.021

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A secondary analysis of the NASH CRN FLINT trial identified a decrease in ALT at week 24 as a predictor of response (namely a decrease in NAS of > -2 and no worsening of fibrosis).

    “A secondary analysis of the NASH CRN FLINT trial identi fi ed a decrease in ALT at week 24 as a predictor of response (namely a decrease in NAS of &gt; -2 and no worsening of fi brosis). 271”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

    The Methods identify this as an analysis of the NASH CRN FLINT trial, and the Discussion identifies a decrease in ALT at week 24 as a predictor of histologic response. The Introduction defines that response as a NAS improvement of at least 2 points without worsening of fibrosis; the citing sentence’s “> -2” does not accurately express that threshold. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An ALT decrease of > -17 U/L yielded the highest accuracy to separate responders from nonresponders (OR > 10).

    “An ALT decrease of &gt; -17 U/L yielded the highest accuracy to separate responders from nonresponders (OR &gt; 10).”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [271]

    The Abstract Results and Results > Univariate Analysis report that an ALT decrease of at least 17 U/L at week 24 was associated with histologic response and differed significantly between responders and nonresponders. Our copy does not establish that ALT alone had the highest classification accuracy or an odds ratio greater than 10; the reported accuracy is for the multivariable model. The paper specifies a decrease of 17 U/L or more, rather than the claim’s ambiguous “> -17 U/L.” (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 124

Authors
Loomba, R., Sanyal, A. J., Kowdley, K. V., Terrault, N., Chalasani, N. P., Abdelmalek, M. F., McCullough, A. J., Shringarpure, R., Ferguson, B., Lee, L., Chen, J., Liberman, A., Shapiro, D., & Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Swedish Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Intercept Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Loomba, Rohit
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
88-95.e5
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2891159865
Cited by
124
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, obeticholic acid, histological response, predictors of treatment response, triglyceride levels, aspartate aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, farnesoid X receptor agonist, liver fibrosis
MeSH terms
Receptor, Farnesoid X-Activated, Adult, Biopsy, Chenodeoxycholic Acid, Decision Support Techniques, Clinical Enzyme Tests, Female, Gastrointestinal Agents, Humans, Ligands, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Time Factors, United States, Biomarkers, Treatment Outcome, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review