The DOI matches its Crossref record; 213 of the 213 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Open accessAbstract
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is estimated to afflict approximately 1 billion individuals worldwide. In a subset of NAFLD patients, who have the progressive form of NAFLD termed nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), it can progress to advanced fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver-related morbidity and mortality. NASH is typically characterized by a specific pattern on liver histology, including steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning with or without peri-sinusoidal fibrosis. Thus, key issues in NAFLD patients are the differentiation of NASH from simple steatosis and identification of advanced hepatic fibrosis. Until now, liver biopsy has been the gold standard for identifying these 2 critical end points, but has well-known limitations, including invasiveness; rare but potentially life-threatening complications; poor acceptability; sampling variability; and cost. Furthermore, due to the epidemic proportion of individuals with NAFLD worldwide, liver biopsy evaluation is impractical, and noninvasive assessment for the diagnosis of NASH and fibrosis is needed. Although much of the work remains to be done in establishing cost-effective strategies for screening for NASH, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, in this review, we summarize the current state of the noninvasive assessment of liver disease in NAFLD, and we provide an expert synthesis of how these noninvasive tools could be utilized in clinical practice. Finally, we also list the key areas of research priorities in this area to move forward clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Non-invasive tools perform well to rule-in and rule-out steatosis and fibrosis, 2”
From Muscle fat content is strongly associated with NASH: a longitudinal study in patients with morbid obesity (2021) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Items 201–213 of 213
Ferraioli, G., Tinelli, C., Lissandrin, R., Zicchetti, M., Rondanelli, M., Perani, G., Bernuzzi, S., Salvaneschi, L., & Fìlice, C. (2014) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-014-9573-1 · Cited by 43
Bril, F., Portillo-Sánchez, P., Liu, I., Kalavalapalli, S., Dayton, K., & Cusi, K. J. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-1349 · Cited by 42
Xia, M., Yki‐Järvinen, H., Bian, H., Lin, H., Yan, H., Chang, X., Zhou, Y., & Gao, X. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160526 · Cited by 41
Recio, E., Cifuentes, C., Macı́as, J., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0b013e32835f4c3d · Cited by 40
Ratchatasettakul, K., Rattanasiri, S., Promson, K., et al. (2017) · BMC Gastroenterology · doi:10.1186/s12876-017-0609-6 · Cited by 35
Naveau, S., Voican, C. S., Lebrun, A., Gaillard, M., Lamouri, K., Njiké‐Nakseu, M., Courie, R., Tranchart, H., Balian, A., Prevot, S., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000000919 · Cited by 35
Pîrvulescu, I., Gheorghe, L., Csiki, I. E., Becheanu, G., Dumbravă, M., Fica, S. V., Martin, S., Sarbu, A. E., Gheorghe, C., Diculescu, M. M., et al. (2012) · PubMed · Cited by 28
Can Elastography Differentiate Isolated Fatty Liver from Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis?
Ajmera, V. H., & Loomba, R. S. (2018) · Seminars in Liver Disease · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1618587 · Cited by 25
Self-citationMusso, G., Cassader, M., Michieli, F. D., Saba, F., Bo, S., & Gambino, R. (2011) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.111.015610 · Cited by 24
Wu, B., Han, W., Li, Z., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep19339 · Cited by 24
Lee, C., Jeong, W. K., Lim, S., et al. (2016) · Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2016.01.026 · Cited by 20
Chang, Y., Lin, H.-C., Hwu, D., Chang, D., Lin, K., & Lee, Y. (2018) · Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.1177/0004563218796259 · Cited by 20
Huang, J., Yeh, M., Huang, C., Huang, C., Tsai, P., Tai, C., Yang, H., Dai, C., Hsieh, M., Chen, S., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0174394 · Cited by 18
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 2015, Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado. EASL-ALEH Clinical Practice Guidelines: non-invasive tests for evaluation of liver disease severity and prognosis, J Hepatol, 63, 237, 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Petta, 2017, Improved noninvasive prediction of liver fibrosis by liver stiffness measurement in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease accounting for controlled attenuation parameter values, Hepatology, 65, 1145, 10.1002/hep.28843 · DOI
- Sasso, 2010, Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel VCTE guided ultrasonic attenuation measurement for the evaluation of hepatic steatosis: preliminary study and validation in a cohort of patients with chronic liver disease from various causes, Ultrasound Med Biol, 36, 1825, 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.07.005 · DOI
- Caussy, 2018, Optimal threshold of controlled attenuation parameter with MRI-PDFF as the gold standard for the detection of hepatic steatosis, Hepatology, 67, 1348, 10.1002/hep.29639 · DOI
- Dietrich, 2017, EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017 (Long Version), Eur J Ultrasound, 38, e16
- Friedrich-Rust, 2016, Critical comparison of elastography methods to assess chronic liver disease, Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 13, 402, 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.86 · DOI
- Caussy, 2018, Non-invasive, quantitative assessment of liver fat by MRI-PDFF as an endpoint in NASH trials, Hepatology, 68, 763, 10.1002/hep.29797 · DOI
- Dulai, 2016, MRI and MRE for non-invasive quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD and NASH: clinical trials to clinical practice, J Hepatol, 65, 1006, 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.06.005 · DOI
- Chen, 2011, Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography, Radiology, 259, 749, 10.1148/radiol.11101942 · DOI
- Chen, 2017, Diagnostic performance of MR elastography and vibration-controlled transient elastography in the detection of hepatic fibrosis in patients with severe to morbid obesity, Radiology, 283, 418, 10.1148/radiol.2016160685 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rinella, M. E., Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Siddiqui, M. S., Abdelmalek, M. F., Caldwell, S., Barb, D., Kleiner, D. E., & Loomba, R. (2023) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000000323 · Cited by 2,667
Self-citationCusi, K., Isaacs, S., Barb, D., Basu, R., Caprio, S., Garvey, W. T., Kashyap, S., Mechanick, J. I., Mouzaki, M., Nadolsky, K., et al. (2022) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2022.03.010 · Cited by 1,021
Advancing the global public health agenda for NAFLD: a consensus statement
Lazarus, J. V., Mark, H. E., Anstee, Q. M., Arab, J. P., Batterham, R. L., Castera, L., Cortez-Pinto, H., Crespo, J., Cusi, K., Dirac, M. A., et al. (2022) · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00523-4 · Cited by 757
Self-citationNAFLD as a Continuum: From Obesity to Metabolic Syndrome and Diabetes
Godoy-Matos, A. F., Silva Júnior, W. S., & Valerio, C. M. (2020) · Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome · doi:10.1186/s13098-020-00570-y · Cited by 643
MAFLD identifies patients with significant hepatic fibrosis better than NAFLD
Yamamura, S., Eslam, M., Kawaguchi, T., Tsutsumi, T., Nakano, D., Yoshinaga, S., Takahashi, H., Anzai, K., George, J., & Torimura, T. (2020) · Liver International · doi:10.1111/liv.14675 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Castera, L., Friedrich-Rust, M., & Loomba, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1264-1281.e4
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7505052
- OpenAlex
- W2909812323
- Cited by
- 1,494
- References
- 213
- Citations by year
- 2026: 156 · 2025: 212 · 2024: 213 · 2023: 210 · 2022: 249 · 2021: 258 · 2020: 148 · 2019: 46
- FWCI
- 25.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Allergan
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
- Gilead Sciences
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- National Institutes of Health (P42ES010337)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Keywords
- non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, non-invasive assessment, liver fibrosis, liver cirrhosis, liver biopsy limitations, steatosis, ballooning, hepatocellular carcinoma
- MeSH terms
- Biopsy, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Function Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Predictive Value of Tests, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Biomarkers, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
