Cited by 102Celiac Disease Research and ManagementWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyEosinophilic Esophagitis

Progression of Celiac Disease in Children With Antibodies Against Tissue Transglutaminase and Normal Duodenal Architecture

Auricchio, Renata, Mandile, Roberta, Del Vecchio, Maria Rosaria, Scapaticci, Serena, Galatola, Martina, Maglio, Mariantonia, Discepolo, Valentina, Miele, Erasmo +3 more·2019·Gastroenterology

Abstract

Background & aims Potential celiac disease is characterized by positive results from serologic tests for tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-TG2) but normal duodenal architecture (Marsh stages 0-1). There is controversy over the best way to manage these patients. We investigated risk factors associated with the development of villous atrophy in children with potential celiac disease. Methods We performed a prospective study of 280 children (ages 2-18 years) in Italy with suspected celiac disease, followed for up to 12 years (range, 18-150 months; median 60 months). The subjects had 2 consecutive positive results from tests for anti-TG2, tested positive for the endomysial antibody (anti-EMA), had total serum levels of immunoglobulin A in the normal range, normal duodenal architecture (Marsh stages 0-1) in 5 biopsies, and HLA DQ2- or DQ8-positive haplotypes. The children underwent serologic tests and clinical analyses every 6 months and a small bowel biopsy was taken every 2 years. A total of 210 patients of the original cohort were assessed at the 9-year follow-up evaluation. We performed multivariate analyses of clinical, genetic, and histologic data to identify factors associated with progression to villous atrophy. Results During the follow-up period, 42 (15%) of 280 children developed villous atrophy, whereas 89 (32%) children no longer tested positive for anti-TG2 or anti-EMA. The cumulative incidence of progression to villous atrophy was 43% at 12 years. In multivar…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.04.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Auricchio, R., Mandile, R., Del Vecchio, M. R., Scapaticci, S., Galatola, M., Maglio, M., Discepolo, V., Miele, E., Cielo, D., Troncone, R., & Greco, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Auricchio, Renata
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
157
Issue
2
Pages
413-420.e3
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2939829773
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
FWCI
11.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Keywords
celiac disease, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, anti-endomysial antibodies, villous atrophy, Marsh classification, HLA-DQB1*02, HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, gluten-free diet, risk factors, children, disease progression, immunoglobulin A, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Adolescent, Atrophy, Autoantibodies, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Duodenum, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Italy, Male, Prospective Studies, Transglutaminases, Incidence, Disease Progression, GTP-Binding Proteins, Diet, Gluten-Free

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review