Progression of Celiac Disease in Children With Antibodies Against Tissue Transglutaminase and Normal Duodenal Architecture
Abstract
Background & aims Potential celiac disease is characterized by positive results from serologic tests for tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-TG2) but normal duodenal architecture (Marsh stages 0-1). There is controversy over the best way to manage these patients. We investigated risk factors associated with the development of villous atrophy in children with potential celiac disease. Methods We performed a prospective study of 280 children (ages 2-18 years) in Italy with suspected celiac disease, followed for up to 12 years (range, 18-150 months; median 60 months). The subjects had 2 consecutive positive results from tests for anti-TG2, tested positive for the endomysial antibody (anti-EMA), had total serum levels of immunoglobulin A in the normal range, normal duodenal architecture (Marsh stages 0-1) in 5 biopsies, and HLA DQ2- or DQ8-positive haplotypes. The children underwent serologic tests and clinical analyses every 6 months and a small bowel biopsy was taken every 2 years. A total of 210 patients of the original cohort were assessed at the 9-year follow-up evaluation. We performed multivariate analyses of clinical, genetic, and histologic data to identify factors associated with progression to villous atrophy. Results During the follow-up period, 42 (15%) of 280 children developed villous atrophy, whereas 89 (32%) children no longer tested positive for anti-TG2 or anti-EMA. The cumulative incidence of progression to villous atrophy was 43% at 12 years. In multivar…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Factors predicting evolution to villous atrophy are genetic profile, intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration and intestinal CD antibodies deposits.
“Factors predicting evolution to villous atrophy are genetic profile, intraepithelial lymphocytic infiltration and intestinal CD antibodies deposits (138).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [138]
The first two issues in the management of potential CD find some evidence in the literature.
“The first two issues find some evidence in the literature (133-140).”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [138]
The majority of patients with potential CD remain as 'potential CD,' with a significant percentage normalizing their CD antibodies, frequently observed in younger children.
“The majority remain as 'potential CD,' with a significant percentage of those normalizing their CD antibodies , which is frequently observed in younger children.”
From ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease. (2022) · cites this paper as [138]
Cites
Bhagat, G., Naiyer, A. J., Shah, J. G., Harper, J., Jabri, B., Wang, T. C., Green, P. H. R., & Manavalan, J. S. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci30989 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Szakács, Z., Mátrai, P., Hegyi, P., Szabó, I., Vincze, Á., Balaskó, M., Mosdósi, B., Sarlós, P., Simon, M., Márta, K., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187526 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPGHAN Position Paper on Management and Follow-up of Children and Adolescents With Celiac Disease.
Mearin, M. L., Agardh, D., Antunes, H., Al‐toma, A., Auricchio, R., Castillejo, G., Catassi, C., Ciacci, C., Discepolo, V., Dolinsek, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · doi:10.1097/mpg.0000000000003540 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Auricchio, R., Mandile, R., Del Vecchio, M. R., Scapaticci, S., Galatola, M., Maglio, M., Discepolo, V., Miele, E., Cielo, D., Troncone, R., & Greco, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Naples Federico II (IT)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Auricchio, Renata
- ORCID
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 413-420.e3
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2939829773
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 11.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- Keywords
- celiac disease, anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies, anti-endomysial antibodies, villous atrophy, Marsh classification, HLA-DQB1*02, HLA-DQ2, HLA-DQ8, gluten-free diet, risk factors, children, disease progression, immunoglobulin A, long-term follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Adolescent, Atrophy, Autoantibodies, Biopsy, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Duodenum, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Italy, Male, Prospective Studies, Transglutaminases, Incidence, Disease Progression, GTP-Binding Proteins, Diet, Gluten-Free
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review