CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137Gastrointestinal motility and disordersComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesInfant Health and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and Safety of Peppermint Oil in a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Open access
Weerts, Zsa Zsa R.M., Masclee, Ad A.M., Witteman, Ben J.M., Clemens, Cees H.M., Winkens, Bjorn, Brouwers, Jacobus R.B.J., Frijlink, Henderik W., Muris, Jean W.M., De Wit, Niek J., Essers, Brigitte A.B., Tack, Jan, Snijkers, Johanna T.W., Bours, Andrea M.H., de Ruiter-van der Ploeg, Annieke S., Jonkers, Daisy M.A.E., Keszthelyi, Daniel·2020·Gastroenterology
DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.026
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background & aims Peppermint oil is frequently used to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), despite a lack of evidence for efficacy from high-quality controlled trials. We studied the efficacy and safety of small-intestinal-release peppermint oil in patients with IBS and explored the effects of targeted ileocolonic-release peppermint oil.Methods We performed a double-blind trial of 190 patients with IBS (according to Rome IV criteria) at 4 hospitals in The Netherlands from August 2016 through March 2018; 189 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (mean age, 34.0 years; 77.8% female; 57.7% in primary care), and 178 completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 182 mg small-intestinal-release peppermint oil, 182 mg ileocolonic-release peppermint oil, or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response, as defined by the US Food and Drug Administration: at least a 30% decrease in the weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain compared with baseline in at least 4 weeks. The co-primary endpoint was overall relief of IBS symptoms, as defined by the European Medicines Agency. Secondary endpoints included abdominal pain, discomfort, symptom severity, and adverse events.Results Abdominal pain response did not differ significantly between the peppermint oil and placebo groups: 29 of 62 patients in the small-intestinal-release peppermint oil group had a response (46.8%, P = .170 vs placebo), 26 of 63 patients in the ileocolonic-release peppermint oil group had a response (41.3%, P = .385 vs placebo), and 22 of 64 patients in the placebo group had a response (34.4%). We did not find differences among the groups in overall relief (9.7%, P = .317 and 1.6%, P = .351 vs 4.7% for placebo). The small intestinal peppermint oil did, however, produce greater improvements than placebo in secondary outcomes of abdominal pain (P = .016), discomfort (P = .020), and IBS severity (P = .020). Adverse events, although mild, were more common in both peppermint oil groups (P < .005).Conclusions In a randomized trial of patients with IBS, we found that neither small-intestinal-release nor ileocolonic-release peppermint oil (8 weeks) produced statistically significant reductions in abdominal pain response or overall symptom relief, when using US Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency recommended endpoints. The small-intestinal-release peppermint oil did, however, significantly reduce abdominal pain, discomfort, and IBS severity. These findings do not support further development of ileocolonic-release peppermint oil for treatment of IBS. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT02716285.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.026

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–137 of 137

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Weerts, Z. Z. R. M., Masclee, A. A. M., Witteman, B. J. M., Clemens, C. H. M., Winkens, B., Brouwers, J. R. B. J., Frijlink, H. W., Muris, J. W. M., De Wit, N. J., Essers, B. A. B., Tack, J., Snijkers, J. T. W., Bours, A. M. H., de Ruiter-van der Ploeg, A. S., Jonkers, D. M. A. E., & Keszthelyi, D.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Ziekenhuis Gelderse Vallei (NL)
  • Alrijne Ziekenhuis (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Weerts, Zsa Zsa R.M.
ORCID
Venue
Gastroenterology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
158
Issue
1
Pages
123-136
ISSN
0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.026
OpenAlex
W2970993597
Cited by
137
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 16
FWCI
15.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals
  • AstraZeneca
  • ZonMw (35:1965–1978, 836031017)
  • Kyowa Hakko Kirin
  • Shire
  • Allergan
  • Shionogi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
peppermint oil, irritable bowel syndrome, abdominal pain, symptom relief, adverse events, placebo comparison, IBS symptom severity, Rome IV criteria
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analgesics, Capsules, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Pain Measurement, Plant Oils, Severity of Illness Index, Abdominal Pain, Treatment Outcome, Mentha piperita, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review