The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reply
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“but it seems that the problems can well be solved in a new, promised prospective study, whereby the use of RUCAM may again be helpful, now applying its updated version.36,102–105”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [105]
Citations
Cites
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury
Andrade, R. J., Aithal, G. P., Björnsson, E. S., Kaplowitz, N., Kullak-Ublick, G. A., Larrey, D., & Karlsen, T. H. (2019) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014 · Cited by 1,276
Incidence and Etiology of Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Mainland China
Shen, T., Liu, Y., Shang, J., Xie, Q., Li, J., Yan, M., Xu, J., Niu, J., Liu, J., Watkins, P. B., et al. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.002 · Cited by 615
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Yu, 2017, Hepatol Int, 11, 221, 10.1007/s12072-017-9793-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Ou, 2015, Springerplus, 4, 802, 10.1186/s40064-015-1600-8 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teschke, R., Zhu, Y., & Jing, J. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology · doi:10.14218/jcth.2020.00009 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, T., Mao, Y., & Chen, C.
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1439-1440
- ISSN
- 0016-5085
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review