The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ChatGPT Answers Common Patient Questions About Colonoscopy
Open accessAbstract
ChatGPT (OpenAI) is a 175 billion–parameter large language model (LLM) artificial intelligence (AI) that was released in November 2022. ChatGPT is developed based on the generative pretrained transformer (GPT) 3.5 natural language processing technology and provides a conversational text response to a given prompt.1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“LLMMs have achieved significant advancements in various application scenarios, the implementation of LLMMs provides critical insights for various parties within healthcare providers and patients.”
From Large language models in medical and healthcare fields: applications, advances, and challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Lee et al. 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 20,559
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine
Lee, P., Bubeck, S., & Petro, J. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsr2214184 · Cited by 1,738
What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science
Stokel-Walker, C., & Van Noorden, R. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 · Cited by 828
ChatGPT passing USMLE shines a spotlight on the flaws of medical education
Mbakwe, A. B., Lourentzou, I., Celi, L. A., Mechanic, O. J., & Dagan, A. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000205 · Cited by 273
Ladabaum, U., Mannalithara, A., Meester, R. G. S., Gupta, S. N., & Schoen, R. E. (2019) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023 · Cited by 219
ChatGPT and antimicrobial advice: the end of the consulting infection doctor?
Howard, A., Hope, W., & Gerada, A. (2023) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(23)00113-5 · Cited by 202
Readability Assessment of Online Peripheral Artery Disease Education Materials.
Avra, T., Le, M. H., Hernández, S. H., Thure, K. A., & Ulloa, J. (2022) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.022 · Cited by 28
Murphy, B., Irwin, S. C., Condon, F., & Kennedy, C. (2022) · The Surgeon · doi:10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.009 · Cited by 20
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Gilson, 2023, JMIR Med Educ, 9
- Gaumgartner, 2023, Clin Transl Med, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Large Language Models for Chatbot Health Advice Studies: A Systematic Review
Huo, B., Boyle, A., Marfo, N., Tangamornsuksan, W., Steen, J. P., McKechnie, T., Lee, Y., Mayol, J., Antoniou, S. A., Thirunavukarasu, A. J., et al. (2025) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.57879 · Cited by 283
Large language models in medical and healthcare fields: applications, advances, and challenges
Wang, D., & Zhang, S. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10921-0 · Cited by 246
Evaluation of ChatGPT-generated medical responses: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Wei, Q., Yao, Z., Cui, Y., Wei, B., Jin, Z., & Xu, X. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104620 · Cited by 233
Kresevic, S., Giuffrè, M., Ajcevic, M., Accardo, A., Crocè, L. S., & Shung, D. L. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01091-y · Cited by 207
Wang, L., Wan, Z., Ni, C., Song, Q., Li, Y., Clayton, E. W., Malin, B., & Yin, Z. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22769 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, T.-C., Staller, K., Botoman, V., Pathipati, M. P., Varma, S., & Kuo, B.
- Affiliations
- Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital (TW)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuo, Braden
- Venue
- Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 165
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 509-511.e7
- ISSN
- 0016-5085 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4372231834
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 31
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (K23 DK120945)
- Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, colonoscopy, patient education, artificial intelligence, natural language processing, conversational AI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
