The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation and Management of Patients With Isolated Neutropenia
Open accessAbstract
Neutropenia, defined as an absolute neutrophil count below 1.5 × 109/L, encompasses a wide range of diagnoses, from normal variants to life-threatening acquired and congenital disorders. This review addresses the diagnosis and management of isolated neutropenia, not multiple cytopenias due to splenomegaly, bone marrow replacement, or myelosuppression by chemotherapy or radiation. Laboratory evaluation generally includes repeat complete blood counts with differentials and bone marrow examination with cytogenetics. Neutrophil antibody testing may be useful, but only in the context of clinical and bone marrow findings. The discovery of genes responsible for congenital neutropenias now permits genetic diagnosis in many cases. Management of severe chronic neutropenia includes common-sense precautions to avoid infection; aggressive treatment of bacterial or fungal infections; and administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients with severe congenital neutropenia, particularly those who respond poorly to G-CSF, have a risk of eventually developing myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and require monitoring for this complication, which can also occur without G-CSF therapy. Patients with cyclic, idiopathic and autoimmune neutropenia have virtually no risk of evolving to MDS or AML. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is a curative therapy for congenital neutropenia with MDS/AML or with cytogenetic abnormalities indicating impending conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reich, D., Nalls, M. A., Kao, W. H. L., Akylbekova, E. L., Tandon, A., Patterson, N., Mullikin, J., Hsueh, W.-C., Cheng, C.-Y., Coresh, J., et al. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000360 · Cited by 423
Cited by
Ceriotti, F., Fernandez-Calle, P., Klee, G. G., Nordin, G., Sandberg, S., Streichert, T., Vives-Corrons, J.-L., & Panteghini, M. (2017) · Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) · doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0091 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Newburger, P. E., & Dale, D. C.
- Venue
- Seminars in Hematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-206
- ISSN
- 0037-1963 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118408220
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation and Management of Patients With Isolated Neutropenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.06.010
- The paper
- Newburger, P. E., & Dale, D. C. (2013). Evaluation and Management of Patients With Isolated Neutropenia. Seminars in Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.06.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.