Detecting Early Pancreatic Cancer: Problems and Prospects
Open accessAbstract
Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis. Improving survival will require diagnosis of early pancreatic cancer, which can be defined based on resectability, size, or curability. Pancreatic cancer progresses from noninvasive precursor lesions to invasive cancer over a variable time period. Retrospective review of computed tomography (CT) scans performed prior to diagnosis suggests that pancreatic cancer resectability may be significantly improved if detected as few as 6 months before clinical diagnosis. Since pancreatic cancer is relatively uncommon, to allow cost-effective screening the populations will have to be enriched for the disease using two "sieves." The first sieve would identify a population of subjects at higher than average risk of pancreatic cancer and the second sieve could be a characteristic phenotype among the members of the high-risk group, an abnormality seen on noninvasive imaging or a serologic marker of early pancreatic cancer. So far two high-risk groups have been targets of screening for pancreatic cancer: hereditary pancreatic cancer kindreds and new-onset diabetes. There is no serologic marker of early pancreatic cancer. Confirmation of diagnosis usually requires invasive procedures such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Although much work still needs to be done, the developments in the field provide us with hope that screening for early pancreatic cancer could become a reality in the not-so-distant future.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Standard abdominal CT scans have sensitivity ranging between 76% and 92% for diagnosing pancreatic cancer even in late stages.
“Standard abdominal CT scans (“the pancreas protocol”) have sensitivity ranging between 76% and 92% for diagnosing pancreatic cancer even in late stages of the disease.204,205”
From Artificial Intelligence and Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: 2020 Summative Review (2021) · cites this paper as [204]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 191
- Authors
- Chari, S. T.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chari, Suresh T.
- ORCID
- Chari, Suresh T.
- Venue
- Seminars in Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 284-294
- ISSN
- 0093-7754 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2680914
- OpenAlex
- W2014767306
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Seminars in Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA100685)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- early-stage pancreatic cancer, pancreatic cancer screening, resectability, precursor lesions, vulnerable populations, new-onset diabetes, serological markers, endoscopic ultrasound, computed tomography, cost-effective screening
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Precancerous Conditions, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Endosonography, Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal, Early Diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review