The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Tolerance Induction in HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation
Open accessAbstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many hematologic and immunologic diseases. Further, partial or full donor hematopoietic chimerism following alloSCT may be sufficient to guarantee immunologic tolerance to solid organs from the same donor, obviating any requirement for prolonged pharmacologic immunosuppression. Despite alloSCT’s potential, the procedure is beset by two major limitations. The first relates to the procedure’s toxicity including conditioning regimen toxicity, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and infection. The second limitation is the lack of histocompatible donors. A human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor cannot be identified expeditiously for up to 40% of patients. Historically, alloSCT from partially HLA-mismatched or HLA-haploidentical relatives has been complicated by unacceptably high incidences of graft rejection, severe GVHD, and non-relapse mortality. Recently, our groups have developed a method to selectively deplete alloreactive cells in vivo by administering high doses of cyclophosphamide in a narrow window after transplantation. Using high-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT/Cy), crossing the HLA barrier in alloSCT is now feasible and donors can be found for nearly all patients. This review discusses the history of HLA-haploidentical SCT, recent clinical results and immunologic mechanisms of action of high-dose PT/Cy for prevention of graft rejection and GVHD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants
Ruggeri, L., Capanni, M., Urbani, E., Perruccio, K., Shlomchik, W. D., Tosti, A., Posati, S., Rogaia, D., Frassoni, F., Aversa, F., et al. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068440 · Cited by 3,380
Cited by
The effect of cyclophosphamide on the immune system: implications for clinical cancer therapy
Ahlmann, M., & Hempel, G. (2016) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-016-3152-1 · Cited by 499
Cooke, K. R., Luznik, L., Sarantopoulos, S., Hakim, F. T., Jagasia, M., Fowler, D. H., van den Brink, M. R. M., Hansen, J. A., Parkman, R., Miklos, D. B., et al. (2017) · Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.023 · Cited by 472
Self-citationTodo, S., Yamashita, K., Goto, R., Zaitsu, M., Nagatsu, A., Oura, T., Watanabe, M., Aoyagi, T., Suzuki, T., Shimamura, T., et al. (2016) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28459 · Cited by 441
Wachsmuth, L. P., Patterson, M. T., Eckhaus, M. A., Venzon, D. J., Gress, R. E., & Kanakry, C. G. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci124218 · Cited by 292
FOXP3+ regulatory T cells and their functional regulation
Li, Z., Li, D., Tsun, A., & Li, B. (2015) · Cellular & Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/cmi.2015.10 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Luznik, L., O'Donnell, P. V., & Fuchs, E. J.
- Venue
- Seminars in Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 683-693
- ISSN
- 0093-7754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066886754
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Tolerance Induction in HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.09.005
- The paper
- Luznik, L., O'Donnell, P. V., & Fuchs, E. J. (2012). Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Tolerance Induction in HLA-Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation. Seminars in Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2012.09.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.