Cited by 6Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementRenal and Vascular Pathologies

Interpretation of visceral duplex scanning: before and after intervention for chronic mesenteric ischemia

Hodgkiss-Harlow, Kelley·2013·Seminars in Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Duplex ultrasound testing has evolved to be a clinically useful modality for the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) due to visceral artery origin atherosclerosis. Patients with known or suspected CMI can be scanned to identify stenosis or occlusion of the celiac, superior mesenteric, and inferior mesenteric arteries. Testing requires expertise in abdominal ultrasound imaging and arterial duplex scan interpretation, as well as a fundamental understanding of visceral artery hemodynamics and collateral pathways created as a result of occlusive lesions. Duplex testing can also be utilized to evaluate functional patency after visceral artery bypass grafting procedures or endovascular stent angioplasty, Repair site stenosis can be reliably identified, which assists in decision making regarding the need for re-intervention to treat or prevent recurrent gut ischemia. Visceral duplex testing of a bypass graft or stent angioplasty site that shows peak systolic velocity >300 cm/s with end-diastolic velocities >50-70 cm/s, or a damped velocity spectra within a bypass graft and low (<40 cm/s) peak systolic velocity should be considered for interrogation by visceral angiography to confirm or exclude severe (>70%) stenosis. Visceral duplex testing should be considered a screening diagnostic modality that complements clinical assessment of CMI both before and after open surgical or endovascular visceral artery interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2013.11.005

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodgkiss-Harlow, K.
Affiliations
Kaiser Permanente (US)
Corresponding author
Hodgkiss-Harlow, Kelley
Venue
Seminars in Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
26
Issue
2-3
Pages
127-132
ISSN
0895-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062501645
Cited by
6
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, graft stenosis, collateral circulation, visceral angiography, gut ischemia
MeSH terms
Hemodynamics, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mesenteric Arteries, Vascular Surgical Procedures, Viscera, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Perioperative Care, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review