Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 316

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology

Open access
Kanamori, Akihiro, Woo, Savio L-Y., Ma, C.Benjamin, Zeminski, Jennifer, Rudy, Theodore W., Li, Guoan, Livesay, Glen A.·2000·Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although it is well known that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a primary restraint of the knee under anterior tibial load, the role of the ACL in resisting internal tibial torque and the pivot shift test is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of these 2 external loading conditions on the kinematics of the intact and ACL-deficient knee and the in situ force in the ACL. TYPE OF STUDY: This study was a biomechanical study that used cadaveric knees with the intact knee of the specimen serving as a control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve human cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. This system applied (1) a 10-Newton meter (Nm) internal tibial torque and (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 10-Nm internal tibial torque (simulated pivot shift test) to the intact and the ACL-deficient knee. RESULTS: In the ACL-deficient knee, the isolated internal tibial torque significantly increased coupled anterior tibial translation over that of the intact knee by 94%, 48%, and 19% at full extension, 15 degrees, and 30 degrees of flexion, respectively (P <.05). In the case of the simulated pivot shift test, there were similar increases in anterior tibial translation, i.e., 103%, 61%, and 32%, respectively (P <.05). Furthermore, the anterior tibial translation under the simulated pivot shift test was significantly greater than under an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). Under the simulated pivot shift test, the in situ forces in the ACL were 83 +/- 16 N at full extension and 93 +/- 23 N at 15 degrees of knee flexion. These forces were also significantly higher when compared with those for an isolated internal tibial torque (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the ACL plays an important role in restraining coupled anterior tibial translation in response to the simulated pivot shift test as well as under an isolated internal tibial torque, especially when the knee is near extension. These findings are also consistent with the clinical observation of anterior tibial subluxation during the pivot shift test with the knee near extension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jars.2000.7682

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 316

Metadata

Authors
Kanamori, A., Woo, S. L.-Y., Ma, C. B., Zeminski, J., Rudy, T. W., Li, G., & Livesay, G. A.
Venue
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
633-639
ISSN
0749-8063 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064776165
Cited by
316
References
0
FWCI
6.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jars.2000.7682
The paper
Kanamori, A., Woo, S. L.-Y., Ma, C. B., Zeminski, J., Rudy, T. W., Li, G., & Livesay, G. A. (2000). The forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and knee kinematics during a simulated pivot shift test: A human cadaveric study using robotic technology. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1053/jars.2000.7682

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.