The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey
Open accessAbstract
A nationwide prospective study was conducted in France in 89 university and primary referral hospitals’ liver units to evaluate practices of liver biopsy and the occurrence of complications. A total of 2,084 biopsies were analyzed, recording the indication, hemostasis parameters, experience of operator, route of biopsy, use of ultrasonography (US), type of hospitalization, side effects, and complications. Pain, anxiety, and discomfort were evaluated by patients by visual analogue scale (VAS). Biopsies were performed by experienced physicians (>150 procedures performed) in 72%, and hepato-gastroenterologists in 89% of the cases. Hepatitis C was the indication in 54%. Sedation or premedication (atropine) was given in 46%. US-guidance was used in 56% of the cases. A day-care procedure was used in 27%. No deaths occurred, but severe complications were observed in 0.57% and increased with the number of passes and decreased with experience of operator, use of atropine, and US-guidance. Pain was independently related to general anesthesia, experience of the operator, female sex, and hepatitis C. Anxiety was increased in women. Discomfort was increased by venous access and decreased with an experienced operator. Acceptance of additional biopsies was related to a day-care procedure and independently related to general anesthesia and multiples passes. This study showed that (1) liver biopsy procedures vary greatly in France, (2) hepatitis C is the main indication for liver biopsy at present, (3) US-guidance should be developed to reduce severe complications, and (4) day-care procedures increase acceptance of a future biopsy and should also be used more often.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wai, C.-T., Greenson, J. K., Fontana, R. J., Kalbfleisch, J. D., Marrero, J. A., Conjeevaram, H. S., & Lok, A. S.-F. (2003) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2003.50346 · Cited by 4,406
Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis
Millonig, G., Reimann, F. M., Friedrich, S., Fonouni, H., Mehrabi, A., Büchler, M. W., Seitz, H. K., & Mueller, S. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22577 · Cited by 599
Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease
Mueller, S. (2010) · Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/hmer.s7394 · Cited by 434
Umemura, T., Joshita, S., Sekiguchi, T., Usami, Y., Shibata, S., Kimura, T., Komatsu, M., Matsumoto, A., Ota, M., & Tanaka, E. (2015) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.118 · Cited by 127
Antifibrotic Agents for Liver Disease
Albanis, E., & Friedman, S. L. (2006) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01143.x · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Cadranel, J.-F., Rufat, P., & Degos, F.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-481
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057320475
- Cited by
- 993
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2000.16602
- The paper
- Cadranel, J.-F., Rufat, P., & Degos, F. (2000). Practices of Liver Biopsy in France: Results of a Prospective Nationwide Survey. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2000.16602
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.