Cited by 120Liver physiology and pathologyCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Hyperstimulation With Interleukin 6 Inhibits Cell Cycle Progression After Hepatectomy in Mice

Wüstefeld, Torsten, Rakemann, Tim, Kubicka, Stefan, Manns, Michael P., Trautwein, Christian·2000·Hepatology

Abstract

Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is an important mediator of hepatocyte proliferation after hepatectomy. However, elevated IL-6 levels are found in patients with chronic liver disease. Therefore, it is unclear if hyperstimulation with IL-6 may have an influence on liver regeneration. We investigated whether a strong activation of IL-6-dependent pathways may change the course of hepatocyte proliferation after hepatectomy. Transgenic mice overexpressing the human soluble IL-6 receptor/gp80 (hsgp80) in hepatocytes were stimulated with or without hepatectomy with human IL-6 (hIL-6). Nuclear extracts were prepared and activation of gp130-dependent pathways was studied by Western blot and gel shift experiments. Cell cycle progression of hepatocytes after hepatectomy was investigated by monitoring cell cycle-specific factors. hIL-6 strongly activates Stat3 for more than 48 hours in human soluble hsgp80 transgenic mice. In contrast, no major differences were evident in the regulation of the Ras/MAP kinase pathway compared with wild-type (wt) mice. Also when hsgp80 mice were stimulated with hIL-6 3 hours before hepatectomy Stat3 is activated for more than 72 hours, whereas in unstimulated mice this event is restricted to the early hours. Strong activation of Stat3 resulted in a delay and inhibition of hepatocyte proliferation as measured by 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) staining and Cyclin A and E expression. This observation directly correlates with the induction of the cell cycle inhibitor p21. In summary, strong IL-6-dependent activation of Stat3 before hepatectomy results in delay and inhibition of cell cycle progression after hepatectomy. Therefore our results suggest that hyperstimulation with IL-6 can inhibit liver regeneration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jhep.2000.16604

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 120

Authors
Wüstefeld, T., Rakemann, T., Kubicka, S., Manns, M. P., & Trautwein, C.
Affiliations
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Trautwein, Christian
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2000-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
514-522
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987042805
Cited by
120
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
interleukin-6, hepatectomy, liver regeneration, hepatocyte proliferation, cell cycle progression, STAT3 activation, gp130 signaling, RAS/MAPK pathway, p21, cyclin A, cyclin E, transgenic mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Cycle, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hepatectomy, Humans, Mice, Transgenic, Postoperative Period, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Stimulation, Chemical, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Trans-Activators, Interleukin-6, S Phase, Receptors, Interleukin, Cyclin A, Cyclin E, Receptors, Interleukin-6, rho GTP-Binding Proteins, STAT3 Transcription Factor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review