Cited by 106Hepatitis B Virus StudiesHepatitis C virus researchLiver physiology and pathology

Increased hepatocyte turnover and inhibition of woodchuck hepatitis B virus replication by adefovir in vitro do not lead to reduction of the closed circular DNA.

Dandri, Maura, Burda, Martin R., Will, Hans, Petersen, Joerg·2000·Hepatology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inhibitory effect of the nucleotide analogue adefovir on woodchuck hepatitis B virus (WHV) replication and, in particular, to determine whether the pool of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) could be reduced by adefovir treatment in primary cultures of woodchuck hepatocytes isolated from a chronic carrier. Strong reduction of WHV-DNA synthesis (90%) and secretion (up to 98%) was observed with all 3 doses of adefovir used (1, 10, and 100 micromol/L), whereas in the absence of the drug, high amounts of viral particles were continuously secreted in the culture medium until the end of the study (27 days). Secretion of envelope proteins and viral RNA levels remained constant both in the adefovir-treated and -untreated cultures for the entire course of the study. Intracellular core protein levels declined by approximately 50% in all the cultures, independent of adefovir treatment. There was no indication of cccDNA loss in the adefovir-treated hepatocyte cultures even when cell turnover was induced for 14 days by the addition of epidermal growth factor (EGF) to the culture medium. Our data show that adefovir has a very strong inhibitory effect on WHV-DNA synthesis in chronically infected primary hepatocyte cultures and indicate that cccDNA is a very stable molecule that appears to be efficiently transmitted to the dividing hepatocytes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jhep.2000.8701

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NA alone has little or no effect on the elimination of replicative templates of HBV, the cccDNA, despite effective suppression of HBV replication by inhibiting viral reverse transcriptase.

    “It is clear now that NA alone has little or no effect on the elimination of replicative templates of hepatitis B virus (HBV), the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), despite its effective suppression of HBV replication by inhibiting viral reverse transcriptase.1,2”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 106

Authors
Dandri, M., Burda, M. R., Will, H., & Petersen, J.
Affiliations
Leibniz Institute of Virology (LIV) (DE)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Joerg
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2000-07
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
139-146
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973866726
Cited by
106
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Hepatitis B Virus Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatitis C virus research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
adefovir, covalently closed circular DNA, viral DNA synthesis inhibition, hepatocyte turnover, chronic viral infection, core protein, viral replication, epidermal growth factor
MeSH terms
Adenine, Animals, Antiviral Agents, Cells, Cultured, DNA, Circular, DNA, Viral, Epidermal Growth Factor, Liver, Marmota, Virus Replication, Hepatitis B Virus, Woodchuck, Organophosphonates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review