The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Upper Digestive Bleeding in Cirrhosis. Post–Therapeutic Outcome and Prognostic Indicators
Open accessAbstract
Several treatments have been proven to be effective for variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. The aim of this multicenter, prospective, cohort study was to assess how these treatments are used in clinical practice and what are the posttherapeutic prognosis and prognostic indicators of upper digestive bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. A training set of 291 and a test set of 174 bleeding cirrhotic patients were included. Treatment was according to the preferences of each center and the follow–up period was 6 weeks. Predictive rules for 5–day failure (uncontrolled bleeding, rebleeding, or death) and 6–week mortality were developed by the logistic model in the training set and validated in the test set. Initial treatment controlled bleeding in 90% of patients, including vasoactive drugs in 27%, endoscopic therapy in 10%, combined (endoscopic and vasoactive) in 45%, balloon tamponade alone in 1%, and none in 17%. The 5–day failure rate was 13%, 6–week rebleeding was 17%, and mortality was 20%. Corresponding findings for variceal versus nonvariceal bleeding were 15% versus 7% (P = .034), 19% versus 10% (P = .019), and 20% versus 15% (P = .22). Active bleeding on endoscopy, hematocrit levels, aminotransferase levels, Child–Pugh class, and portal vein thrombosis were significant predictors of 5–day failure; alcohol–induced etiology, bilirubin, albumin, encephalopathy, and hepatocarcinoma were predictors of 6–week mortality. Prognostic reassessment including blood transfusions improved the predictive accuracy. All the developed prognostic models were superior to the Child–Pugh score. In conclusion, prognosis of digestive bleeding in cirrhosis has much improved over the past 2 decades. Initial treatment stops bleeding in 90% of patients. Accurate predictive rules are provided for early recognition of high–risk patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
Yeo, Y. H., Samaan, J. S., Ng, W. H., Ting, P.-S., Trivedi, H., Vipani, A., Ayoub, W., Yang, J. D., Liran, O., Spiegel, B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.02.06.23285449 · Cited by 666
Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks
D'Amico, G., Morabito, A., D'Amico, M., Pasta, L., Malizia, G., Rebora, P., & Valsecchi, M. G. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.020 · Cited by 536
Self-citationShung, D. L., Au, B., Taylor, R. A., Tay, J. K., Laursen, S. B., Stanley, A. J., Dalton, H. R., Ngu, J., Schultz, M., & Laine, L. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.009 · Cited by 227
“Two studies examined the prediction of mortality on external validation with ML models compared to liver-specific Child-Pugh and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores (designed to predict mortality in all patients with cirrhosis rather than in those presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding), and only 1 study found…”
Metadata
- Authors
- D'Amico, G., & De Franchis, R.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 599-612
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2145791480
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upper Digestive Bleeding in Cirrhosis. Post–Therapeutic Outcome and Prognostic Indicators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2003.50385
- The paper
- D'Amico, G., & De Franchis, R. (2003). Upper Digestive Bleeding in Cirrhosis. Post–Therapeutic Outcome and Prognostic Indicators. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.