Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 175

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increased content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath condensate of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: no significant effect of cigarette smoking

Open access
NOWAK, D., KASIELSKI, M., ANTCZAK, A., PIETRAS, T., BIALASIEWICZ, P.·1999·Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

The imbalance between oxidants and antioxidants is known to play an important role in the pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cigarette smoking is the most frequent factor responsible for development of COPD by leading to oxidant overload in the lower airways, due to presence of its own oxidants and to recruitment and activation of pulmonary phagocytes. We aimed to determine whether (1) patients with stable COPD have higher thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARs, an end-product of lipid peroxidation) and H2O2 levels in expired breath condensate than healthy subjects who have never smoked; (2) COPD subjects who are current smokers exhale more TBARs and H2O2 than COPD ex-smokers and those who have never smoked; and (3) concentration of TBARs correlates with H2O2 levels in the breath condensate of COPD patients. The TBAR and H2O2 content in expired breath condensate of 17 healthy nonsmoking subjects and 44 patients (11 current smokers, 20 ex-smokers and 13 who had never smoked) with stable COPD [forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 63.3 +/- 16.3% and FEV1 reversibility 5.2 +/- 4.3% predicted value] was measured spectrofluorimetrically by the thiobarbituric acid and homovanillic acid methods, respectively. The mean concentrations of TBARs and H2O2 in the expired breath condensate of COPD subjects were 12 (0.48-0.86 microM vs. 0.04 +/- 0.14 microM; P < 0.05) and 10 times (0.48 +/- 0.67 microM vs. 0.05 +/- 0.07 microM; P < 0.005) higher than in healthy controls. Current smokers with COPD did not exhale more H2O2 than COPD ex-smokers and those who had never smoked. TBARs levels shared only a tendency to be higher in the breath condensate of smoking COPD subjects than in that of ex-smokers (0.92 +/- 1.49 microM vs. 0.35 +/- 0.44 microM) and of COPD subjects who had never smoked (0.92 +/- 1.49 microM vs. 0.30 +/- 0.53 microM). No correlation was found between TBAR and H2O2 levels in the whole COPD group. These variables did not correlate with cigarette smoking status and the time from smoking cessation. Subjects with stable COPD exhibit increased lipid peroxidation and H2O2 generation in the airways. Current cigarette smoking does not distinguish COPD subjects with respect to TBARs and H2O2 exhalation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/rmed.1999.0574

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 175

Metadata

Authors
NOWAK, D., KASIELSKI, M., ANTCZAK, A., PIETRAS, T., & BIALASIEWICZ, P.
Venue
Respiratory Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-06
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
389-396
ISSN
0954-6111 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170168774
Cited by
175
References
0
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Increased content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath condensate of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: no significant effect of cigarette smoking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/rmed.1999.0574
The paper
NOWAK, D., KASIELSKI, M., ANTCZAK, A., PIETRAS, T., & BIALASIEWICZ, P. (1999). Increased content of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances and hydrogen peroxide in the expired breath condensate of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: no significant effect of cigarette smoking. Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1053/rmed.1999.0574

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.