Cited by 6Child Abuse and TraumaStress Responses and CortisolPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

A developmental and neurobiological approach to early trauma research

Monk, Christopher S., Pine, Daniel S., Charney, Dennis S.·2002·Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry

Abstract

Basic and clinical research documents associations between stress and a set of related psychobiologic perturbations, including dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, alterations in the structure and function of the medial temporal lobe, and impairments in explicit memory. Although these associations are thought to emerge developmentally, insufficient clinical research elucidates the manner in which early trauma relates to these abnormalities. To gain a better understanding of relevant processes, we propose the use of a developmental and neurobiological approach, where data in animal models are used to inform studies in traumatized children who will be followed longitudinally. This approach will help clarify how early traumatic events have the capacity to lead to psychopathology or a healthy outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/scnp.2002.31793

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The timing of stress and its interactions with dynamic developmental processes are critical to subsequent outcomes.

    “The timing of stress and its interactions with dynamic developmental processes are critical to subsequent outcomes (e.g., Lupien et al., 2009, Monk, 2008, Monk et al., 2002, Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2011, Eiland and Romeo, 2013).”

    From The impact of developmental timing for stress and recovery (2015) · cites this paper as Monk et al., 2002, Pechtel and Pizzagalli, 2011, Eiland and Romeo, 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monk, C. S., Pine, D. S., & Charney, D. S.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
137-146
ISSN
1084-3612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069599286
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2015: 1
FWCI
1.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
early childhood trauma, developmental trauma, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress, medial temporal lobe, declarative memory, longitudinal follow-up, psychopathology, neurobiology of stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Brain, Child, Dexamethasone, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review