The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sigma-2 receptors as a biomarker of proliferation in solid tumours
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies from the authors' group showed that the density of σ2Rs is higher in proliferating breast cancer cells relative to cancer cells driven into quiescence by prolonged serum starvation.
“Previous studies from our group have shown that the density of σ2Rs is higher in proliferating breast cancer cells relative to cancer cells driven into quiescence (i.e., G0) by prolonged serum starvation28,29.”
From Sigma-2 Receptor/TMEM97 and PGRMC-1 Increase the Rate of Internalization of LDL by LDL Receptor through the Formation of a Ternary Complex (2018) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Riad, A., Zeng, C., Weng, C.-C., Winters, H., Xu, K., Makvandi, M., Metz, T., Carlin, S., & Mach, R. H. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-35430-3 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, K. T., Wang, L.-M., Wallen, C. A., Childers, S. R., Cline, J. M., Keng, P. C., & Mach, R. H.
- Venue
- British Journal of Cancer
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1223-1232
- ISSN
- 0007-0920
- 1532-1827
- PMC
- PMC2363350
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
