The Effect of Metformin Therapy for Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Objective This study was to analyze the efficacy of metformin intervention in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials or observational studies of metformin intervention in preventing symptoms of GDM during pregnancy were performed. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through to now. The main evaluated primary outcomes were incident of GDM, miscarriage, preterm delivery, and neonatal mortality. The evaluated secondary outcomes were mean difference of gestational age at birth and birth weight between metformin group and control group. Results We included 6 studies including 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 2 observational studies, and 1 non-RCT in our meta-analysis. A total of 643 patients were enrolled for a follow-up study with continued metformin therapy (n=341) or not (n=302) during pregnancy. Metformin therapy reduced the proportion of patients developing GDM (log Odds Ratio: -1.27; 95%CI: -2.24 to -0.30) but had no significant effect on reducing the proportion of abortion, preterm delivery, and neonatal death in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Also, it did not cause a significant difference in gestational age at birth and birth weight in metformin group versus control/placebo group. Conclusions Metformin was associated with less frequent GDM development than control diets, suggesting that it is the appropriate intervention to be prescribed to prevent GDM in patients with PCOS.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Evidence regarding the impact of metformin on the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus is controversial.
“Evidence regarding the impact of metformin on the incidence of GDM is controversial [58–61].”
From From Prediabetes to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Lifestyle and Pharmacological Management (2020) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 31
- Authors
- Zhao, J., Liu, X., & Zhang, W.
- Affiliations
- Shandong University (CN)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
- Venue
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2018-06-11
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 199-205
- ISSN
- 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-3646
- OpenAlex
- W2808062916
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
- Keywords
- metformin, gestational diabetes mellitus, polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy, GDM prevention, miscarriage, preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth weight, gestational age
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review