Cited by 31Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementOvarian function and disordersPregnancy and Medication Impact

The Effect of Metformin Therapy for Preventing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis

Zhao, Jing, Liu, Xiaoyan, Zhang, Wenhua·2020·Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes

Abstract

Objective This study was to analyze the efficacy of metformin intervention in preventing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials or observational studies of metformin intervention in preventing symptoms of GDM during pregnancy were performed. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through to now. The main evaluated primary outcomes were incident of GDM, miscarriage, preterm delivery, and neonatal mortality. The evaluated secondary outcomes were mean difference of gestational age at birth and birth weight between metformin group and control group. Results We included 6 studies including 3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), 2 observational studies, and 1 non-RCT in our meta-analysis. A total of 643 patients were enrolled for a follow-up study with continued metformin therapy (n=341) or not (n=302) during pregnancy. Metformin therapy reduced the proportion of patients developing GDM (log Odds Ratio: -1.27; 95%CI: -2.24 to -0.30) but had no significant effect on reducing the proportion of abortion, preterm delivery, and neonatal death in pregnant women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Also, it did not cause a significant difference in gestational age at birth and birth weight in metformin group versus control/placebo group. Conclusions Metformin was associated with less frequent GDM development than control diets, suggesting that it is the appropriate intervention to be prescribed to prevent GDM in patients with PCOS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-0603-3394

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 31

Authors
Zhao, J., Liu, X., & Zhang, W.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
Venue
Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes
Published
2018-06-11
Volume
128
Issue
03
Pages
199-205
ISSN
  • 0947-7349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3646
OpenAlex
W2808062916
Cited by
31
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
metformin, gestational diabetes mellitus, polycystic ovary syndrome, pregnancy, GDM prevention, miscarriage, preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth weight, gestational age
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Metformin, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Gestational, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review