A prospective trial of CONfocal endomicroscopy in CYSTic lesions of the pancreas: CONCYST-01
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background and study aims Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCL) are common. While some harbor malignant potential, accurate preoperative diagnosis remains challenging. Needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) via a 19G FNA needle enables real-time imaging of the cyst wall. This study evaluated the safety and utility of nCLE in patients with an indeterminate PCL undergoing EUS-FNA. Patients and methods The CONCYST study prospectively recruited patients with indeterminate PCL attending three hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) referral centers in the UK, with indeterminate PCL, who required EUS-FNA between July 2014 and October 2016. Following the procedure, all patients were followed up in telephone clinic for at least 12 months. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the National Research Ethics Service (14/LO/0040). Results Sixty-seven patient were recruited, 11 excluded and 56 included in the final analysis: 35 male, 21 female; median age 68 (range 28 – 80). Recognizable confocal images were obtained in 48 of 56 cases. Median nCLE scanning time was 5 minutes and did not exceed 10 minutes in any case. EUS-nCLE findings correlated with final diagnosis (based on imaging, cytology and multidisciplinary team review) in 43/56 (77 %) of cases, compared with 37/56 (66 %) for cytology alone (P = 0.12). One patient experienced mild pruritus following the procedure and another developed an infected pseudocyst, which resolved with antibiotics. Conclusions EUS-nCLE under conscious sedation in the day case setting is safe and provides additional information to standard EUS-FNA for diagnosing indeterminate PCL.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating benign cysts that require no follow-up from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
“Studies have shown good sensitivity with excellent specificity for differentiating between benign cysts that require no follow-up and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.44–46”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 27
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [4]Adsay N V Fukushima N Furukawa T Intraductal neoplasm of the pancreas Lyon WHO Press 2010
- Authors
- Keane, M. G., Wehnert, N., Perez-Machado, M., Fusai, G. K., Thorburn, D., Oppong, K. W., Carroll, N., Metz, A. J., & Pereira, S. P.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus, Pond St, London, UK
- Freeman Hospital (GB)
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Pereira, Stephen P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Endoscopy International Open
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2019-08-29
- Volume
- 07
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- E1117-E1122
- ISSN
- 2196-9736 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-3722
- PMC
- PMC6715431
- OpenAlex
- W2971229474
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Endoscopy International Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Pancreatic Cancer UK (PCUK-2018-EDA Pereira)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0712-28114)
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
- Keywords
- pancreatic cysts, needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration, preoperative diagnosis, diagnostic accuracy, procedural safety, cytology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review