Cited by 69AI in cancer detectionGastric Cancer Management and OutcomesColorectal Cancer Screening and Detection

Deep Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Gastric Neoplasms in Real-Time Endoscopy: Development and Validation Study

Gong, Eun Jeong, Bang, Chang Seok, Lee, Jae Jun, Baik, Gwang Ho, Lim, Hyun, Jeong, Jae Hoon, Choi, Sung Won, Cho, Joonhee +9 more·2023·Endoscopy

Abstract

Background Deep learning models have previously been established to predict the histopathology and invasion depth of gastric lesions using endoscopic images. This study aimed to establish and validate a deep learning-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) for the automated detection and classification (diagnosis and invasion depth prediction) of gastric neoplasms in real-time endoscopy. Methods The same 5017 endoscopic images that were employed to establish previous models were used for the training data. The primary outcomes were: (i) the lesion detection rate for the detection model, and (ii) the lesion classification accuracy for the classification model. For performance validation of the lesion detection model, 2524 real-time procedures were tested in a randomized pilot study. Consecutive patients were allocated either to CDSS-assisted or conventional screening endoscopy. The lesion detection rate was compared between the groups. For performance validation of the lesion classification model, a prospective multicenter external test was conducted using 3976 novel images from five institutions. Results The lesion detection rate was 95.6 % (internal test). On performance validation, CDSS-assisted endoscopy showed a higher lesion detection rate than conventional screening endoscopy, although statistically not significant (2.0 % vs. 1.3 %; P = 0.21) (randomized study). The lesion classification rate was 89.7 % in the four-class classification (advanced gastric cancer, early gastric cancer, dysplasia, and non-neoplastic) and 89.2 % in the invasion depth prediction (mucosa confined or submucosa invaded; internal test). On performance validation, the CDSS reached 81.5 % accuracy in the four-class classification and 86.4 % accuracy in the binary classification (prospective multicenter external test). Conclusions The CDSS demonstrated its potential for real-life clinical application and high performance in terms of lesion detection and classification of detected lesions in the stomach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2031-0691

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By integrating and analyzing patient symptoms, medical history, test results, and other risk factors, CDSS have the capability to support disease detection and identification.

    “By integrating and analyzing patient symptoms, medical history, test results, and other risk factors, CDSS have the capability to support disease detection and identification [214,215], such as the subtle or ambiguous patterns that clinicians often overlook [216,217].”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 69

Authors
Gong, E. J., Bang, C. S., Lee, J. J., Baik, G. H., Lim, H., Jeong, J. H., Choi, S. W., Cho, J., Kim, D. Y., Lee, K. B., Shin, S.-I., Sigmund, D., Moon, B. I., Park, S. C., Lee, S. H., Bang, K. B., & Son, D.-S.
Affiliations
  • Hallym University (KR)
  • AIDOT Inc., Seoul, South Korea
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Dankook University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Bang, Chang Seok
Venue
Endoscopy
Published
2023-02-08
Volume
55
Issue
08
Pages
701-708
ISSN
  • 0013-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1438-8812
OpenAlex
W4319460613
Cited by
69
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endoscopy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
2020 Olympus Korea grant from the Korean Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Foundation (2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Keywords
clinical decision support systems, stomach neoplasms, deep learning, lesion detection, lesion classification, early gastric cancer, dysplasia, endoscopic screening, computer-aided diagnosis
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Endoscopy, Humans, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Stomach Neoplasms, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Decision Support Systems, Clinical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review