Cited by 3Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesHead and Neck Cancer Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional Rehabilitation and Quality of Life After Fibula Free Flap Reconstruction in Mandibular Defects

Abstract

Patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction often experience long-term functional and aesthetic challenges, impacting their quality of life (QOL). The objective of this study was to identify factors that most powerfully impact the long-term QOL and functional outcome of patients following mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. This investigation was undertaken to enhance the treatment of this patient population. QOL was assessed between March 2022 and May 2023 in 47 consecutive patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with fibula free flaps (FFFs) using the University of Washington QOL Questionnaire. Evaluation of functional outcome was based on mouth opening, jaw deviation, tissue atrophy, tongue mobility, lip competence, and speech intelligibility. The study found that loss of chewing was the strongest impairment of QOL (score: 63.83). The most important negative predictors for QOL were female gender (p = 0.047), radiotherapy (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.007 to p = 0.034), anterior segment resection (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.038 to p = 0.045), advanced defect size (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.008 to p = 0.035), and free-hand fibula reconstruction (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.003 to p = 0.041). Long-term outcomes revealed that reduced tissue atrophy (QOL subcategory p-values: p < 0.001 to p = 0.025) and preserved tongue mobility (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.002 to p = 0.043) were associated with better QOL scores. Functional limitations such as reduced mouth opening (QOL subcategory p-values: p = 0.008 to p = 0.049) and impaired speech intelligibility (QOL subcategory p-values: p < 0.001 to p = 0.015) were significantly correlated with lower QOL in several domains. Mandibular reconstruction with FFFs provides a favorable long-term QOL and functional outcomes, though certain clinical factors, including radiotherapy, anterior segment resection, and defect size, significantly reduce patient-reported QOL.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/a-2687-0316

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Fiedler, M., Brunnhuber, C., Eichberger, J., Gottsauner, M., Schuderer, J. G., Maurer, M., Taxis, J., Meier, J. K., Gerken, M., Reichert, T. E., & Ettl, T.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
  • University of Regensburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery
Published
2025-08-21
Volume
42
Issue
06
Pages
482-490
ISSN
  • 0743-684X (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8947
OpenAlex
W4413385670
Cited by
2
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Keywords
mandibular reconstruction, fibula free flap, quality of life, functional outcome, mandibular defects, mouth opening, radiotherapy, defect size, tissue atrophy, tongue mobility, speech intelligibility, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Fibula, Humans, Male, Mandible, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Speech Intelligibility, Treatment Outcome, Free Tissue Flaps, Mandibular Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review