The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Non-Scar Fixation Technique for Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Tripod Fracture Using Upper Lid Transconjunctival Incision
Open accessAbstract
Surgical approaches for zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures have evolved toward minimizing cutaneous incisions while maintaining adequate exposure. Conventional approaches for frontozygomatic fixation, such as lateral brow or transconjunctival incisions with lateral extension, may result in visible scarring or periocular complications. Building on previous transconjunctival techniques, we applied an independent upper eyelid transconjunctival incision as a non-cutaneous approach for frontozygomatic fixation in selected ZMC tripod fractures. This retrospective comparative study included 27 patients with unilateral ZMC tripod fractures, of whom 12 underwent non-scar fixation using an upper eyelid transconjunctival approach, and 15 underwent fixation through preexisting periorbital traumatic lacerations. The surgical strategy consisted of initial reduction and fixation via an intraoral approach, followed by selective additional fixation of the frontozygomatic region when residual step deformity or instability was present. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative computed tomography and three-dimensional photogrammetry were used to evaluate bony and soft tissue intermalar height differences. Preoperative intermalar height differences were comparable between groups. At 6 months postoperatively, both groups showed marked improvement, with bony differences of −0.2 ± 1.2 mm and −0.4 ± 0.4 mm, and soft tissue differences of 0.0 ± 0.6 mm and −0.2 ± 0.7 mm in the non-scar and control groups, respectively, with no clinically meaningful between-group differences. No clinically significant approach-related ophthalmic complications were observed. The upper eyelid transconjunctival approach is a reliable non-cutaneous option for frontozygomatic fixation in selected ZMC tripod fractures, providing adequate exposure and stable fixation without visible scarring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- M Eski, 2006, A retrospective analysis of 101 zygomatico-orbital fractures, J Craniofac Surg, 17, 1059, 10.1097/01.scs.0000235111.92988.b2 · DOI
- K S Lee, 2022, One-point versus two-point fixation in the management of zygoma complex fractures, Arch Craniofac Surg, 23, 171, 10.7181/acfs.2022.00164 · DOI
- M K Rath, 2015, Optimal osteosynthesis in zygomatic complex fractures, J Craniofac Surg, 26, e605, 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002050 · DOI
- P R Langsdon, 2005, Transconjunctival approach to the zygomatico-frontal limb of orbitozygomatic complex fractures, Facial Plast Surg, 21, 171, 10.1055/s-2005-922855 · DOI
- S Y Kim, 2019, Evaluation of one-point fixation for zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures using a three-dimensional photogrammetric analysis, J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 48, 36, 10.1186/s40463-019-0359-2 · DOI
- B J De Ruiter, 2019, Defining the zygomaticosphenoidal angle as a guide to anatomic zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture reduction, J Craniofac Surg, 30, 2030, 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005724 · DOI
- G Saponaro, 2025, Aesthetic approaches to zygomatic fracture management: Achieving optimal outcomes with minimal scarring, J Craniofac Surg, 36, 279, 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010694 · DOI · Paper page
- R Siy, 2017, Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture, 265
- S H Song, 2018, Open reduction of zygoma fractures with the extended transconjunctival approach and T-bar screw reduction, Arch Plast Surg, 45, 325, 10.5999/aps.2018.00311 · DOI · Paper page
- P N Manson, 1990, Toward CT-based facial fracture treatment, Plast Reconstr Surg, 85, 202, 10.1097/00006534-199002000-00006 · DOI
- M Fujioka, 2002, Stability of one-plate fixation for zygomatic bone fracture, Plast Reconstr Surg, 109, 817, 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00069 · DOI
- J Davidson, 1990, Zygomatic fractures: comparison of methods of internal fixation, Plast Reconstr Surg, 86, 25, 10.1097/00006534-199007000-00004 · DOI
- K Hwang, 2010, One-point fixation of tripod fractures of zygoma through a lateral brow incision, J Craniofac Surg, 21, 1042, 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e48607 · DOI
- Y Yonehara, 2005, Treatment of zygomatic fractures without inferior orbital rim fixation, J Craniofac Surg, 16, 481, 10.1097/01.SCS.0000157308.39420.74 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cha, H. G., Lee, S. K., Bae, J. S., Nam, S. M., & Park, E. S.
- Affiliations
- Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon (KR)
- Venue
- Archives of Plastic Surgery
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2026-05
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 234-240
- ISSN
- 2234-6163 (ISSN-L)
- 2234-6171
- PMC
- PMC13287917
- OpenAlex
- W7162787474
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Archives of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Soonchunhyang University Research Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone fractures and treatments
- Keywords
- zygomatic fractures, transconjunctival approach, facial trauma surgery, ocular complications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review