The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Overcoming Limitations of Microparticle Measurement by Flow Cytometry
Abstract
Circulating microparticles are submicron vesicles released from cell membranes in response to activation or apoptosis. Acknowledgment of their role both as markers and pathogenic effectors in thrombosis, inflammation, and the spread of cancer has increased the interest of their measurement in clinical practice. However, assessment of their clinical use is impeded by technological issues. Among the different methodologies available, flow cytometry is the most commonly used technique. This review addresses flow cytometry limitations in microparticle measurement that may be subdivided into three domains: sizing, probing, and counting. This article also covers the various standardization strategies and technological improvements that have been proposed to overcome these limitations. New tools using size-calibrated beads and recent progress in instrumentation have opened new avenues to improve detection of microparticle populations of smaller sizes. Significant optimization in microparticle detection is also expected from the use of new fluorescent dyes and the establishment of practical recommendations. Finally, absolute counting of microparticles will also benefit from adapted bead-based strategies or, alternatively, from the generalized availability of volumetric systems. Overall, recent technological improvements maintain flow cytometry as a highly competitive analytical method to measure microparticles. Challenging these evolutions in pathological situations is a mandatory step to validate their real impact in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microparticles in Hemostasis and Thrombosis
Owens, A. P., & Mackman, N. (2011) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.110.233056 · Cited by 835
van der Vlist, E. J., Nolte-'t Hoen, E. N. M., Stoorvogel, W., Arkesteijn, G. J. A., & Wauben, M. H. M. (2012) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.065 · Cited by 532
Separation, characterization and identification of microplastics and nanoplastics in the environment
Fu, W., Min, J., Jiang, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137561 · Cited by 361
CHANDLER, W. L., YEUNG, W., & TAIT, J. F. (2011) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04283.x · Cited by 273
Mobarrez, F., Vikerfors, A., Gustafsson, J. T., Gunnarsson, I., Zickert, A., Larsson, A., Pisetsky, D. S., Wallén, H., & Svenungsson, E. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep36025 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacroix, R., Robert, S., Poncelet, P., & Dignat-George, F.
- Venue
- Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 807-818
- ISSN
- 0094-6176 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-9064
- OpenAlex
- W2024433296
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Overcoming Limitations of Microparticle Measurement by Flow Cytometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0030-1267034
- The paper
- Lacroix, R., Robert, S., Poncelet, P., & Dignat-George, F. (2010). Overcoming Limitations of Microparticle Measurement by Flow Cytometry. Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1267034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.