The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pathological Diagnosis and Classification of Lung Cancer in Small Biopsies and Cytology: Strategic Management of Tissue for Molecular Testing
Abstract
Standardized lung cancer classifications by the World Health Organization have traditionally been based on the histological characteristics of resected tumors with little guidance about diagnosis based on small biopsies and cytology. The focus has mainly been on the separation of small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Until recently there have been no therapeutic implications to further classification of NSCLC, so little attention has historically been given to the distinction of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in these small tissue samples. This situation has changed dramatically in recent years with the discovery of several therapeutic options that are only available to patients with adenocarcinoma or NSCLC, not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS), rather than squamous cell carcinoma. Therefore this article reviews new criteria and terminology recently proposed by the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (IASLC/ATS/ERS) lung adenocarcinoma classification. This includes recommendation for use of special stains as an aid to diagnosis, particularly in the setting of poorly differentiated tumors that do not show clear differentiation by light microscopy. The need for every institution to develop a multidisciplinary strategy to obtain these small specimens and process them not only for diagnosis but also for molecular testing is emphasized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Travis, W. D., Brambilla, E., Noguchi, M., Nicholson, A. G., Geisinger, K., Yatabe, Y., Ishikawa, Y., Wistuba, I., Flieder, D. B., Franklin, W., et al. (2013) · Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2012-0263-ra · Cited by 414
Self-citationp40 (ΔNp63) is superior to p63 for the diagnosis of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma
Bishop, J. A., Teruya-Feldstein, J., Westra, W. H., Pelosi, G., Travis, W. D., & Rekhtman, N. (2012) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/modpathol.2011.173 · Cited by 398
Self-citationAn Expression Signature as an Aid to the Histologic Classification of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Girard, L., Rodriguez-Canales, J., Behrens, C., Thompson, D. M., Botros, I. W., Tang, H., Xie, Y., Rekhtman, N., Travis, W. D., Wistuba, I. I., et al. (2016) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-2900 · Cited by 154
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Travis, W., & Rekhtman, N.
- Venue
- Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 022-031
- ISSN
- 1069-3424 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-9048
- OpenAlex
- W1968510406
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pathological Diagnosis and Classification of Lung Cancer in Small Biopsies and Cytology: Strategic Management of Tissue for Molecular Testing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0031-1272866
- The paper
- Travis, W., & Rekhtman, N. (2011). Pathological Diagnosis and Classification of Lung Cancer in Small Biopsies and Cytology: Strategic Management of Tissue for Molecular Testing. Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1272866
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.