Cited by 112Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Education and Training Studies

Effect of Different Pushing Speeds on Bench Press

Padulo, J., Mignogna, P., Mignardi, S., Tonni, F., D'Ottavio, S.·2012·International Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect on muscular strength after a 3-week training with the bench-press at a fixed pushing of 80-100% maximal speed (FPS) and self-selected pushing speed (SPS). 20 resistance-trained subjects were divided at random in 2 groups differing only regarding the pushing speed: in the FPS group (n=10) it was equal to 80-100% of the maximal speed while in the SPS group (n=10) the pushing speed was self-selected. Both groups were trained twice a week for 3 weeks with a load equal to 85% of 1RM and monitored with the encoder. Before and after the training we measured pushing speed and maximum load. Significant differences between and within the 2 groups were pointed out using a 2-way ANOVA for repeated measures. After 3 weeks a significant improvement was shown especially in the FPS group: the maximum load improved by 10.20% and the maximal speed by 2.22%, while in the SPS group the effect was <1%. This study shows that a high velocity training is required to increase the muscle strength further in subjects with a long training experience and this is possible by measuring the individual performance speed for each load.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0031-1299702

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many studies have manipulated several training variables simultaneously rather than only focusing on movement velocity as the independent variable, making it difficult to interpret research findings.

    “many of them have manipulated several training variables simultaneously [ 2 , 9 , 27 , 28 , 35 ] rather than only focusing on movement velocity as the independent variable, thus making it diffi cult to interpret research fi ndings.”
  • Some isoinertial studies comparing fast- vs. slow-velocity training on strength found greater strength gains when performing repetitions at fast velocities.

    “some found greater strength gains when performing the repetitions at fast velocities [ 17 , 20 , 25 -27 ]”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 31 · Cited by 112

Authors
Padulo, J., Mignogna, P., Mignardi, S., Tonni, F., & D'Ottavio, S.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome, Italy
  • University of Molise (IT)
Venue
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2012-02-08
Volume
33
Issue
05
Pages
376-380
ISSN
  • 0172-4622 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3964
OpenAlex
W1993814143
Cited by
112
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
Keywords
bench press, self-selected speed, maximal speed, resistance training, muscle strength, one-repetition maximum, training load
MeSH terms
Adult, Electromyography, Physical Exertion, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Italy, Task Performance and Analysis, Thorax, Time Factors, Weight Lifting, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review