The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Pediatric Facial Dog Bites
Open accessAbstract
The aim of this study was to characterize and report the epidemiological data regarding pediatric facial dog bites. For this study, a retrospective chart review was used. This study was performed at a large tertiary pediatric hospital. All children younger than 18 years who sought medical attention after a facial dog bite between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008, were included. Demographic and epidemiologic data were collected and analyzed. A total of 537 children were identified. The average age was 4.59±3.36 years, with a slight male preponderance (52.0%). The majority of dog bites occurred in children 5 years of age or younger (68.0%). Almost all (89.8%) of the dogs were known to the children. When circumstances surrounding the bite were documented, over half (53.2%) of the cases were provoked. The most common breeds were mixed breed (23.0%), Labrador retriever (13.7%), Rottweiler (4.9%), and German shepherd (4.4%). Inpatient treatment was required in 121 (22.5%) patients with an average length of stay of 2.96±2.77 days. Children 5 years or younger were more likely to be hospitalized than older children. Children 5 years old and younger are at high risk for being bitten in the face by a familiar dog and are more likely to require hospitalization than older children. Certain dog breeds are more likely to bite, and there is often a history of provocation. There is a tremendous financial and psychosocial burden associated with dog bites, and prevention strategies should focus on education with the aid of public policies and better documentation and reporting systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The majority of dog bites occurred in children 5 years of age or younger (68.0%) and almost all (89.8%) of the dogs were known to the children [166].”
From A One Health Perspective on the Human-Companion Animal Relationship with Emphasis on Zoonotic Aspects. (2020) · cites this paper as [166]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1001/jama.279.1.51 · DOI
- Beck AM, 1985, Public Health Rep, 100, 315
- 10.1053/jpsu.2000.0350580 · DOI
- 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25670 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2005-1451 · DOI
- Avner JR, 1991, Pediatrics, 88, 55, 10.1542/peds.88.1.55 · DOI
- 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addad9 · DOI
- 10.1136/ip.2007.016220 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.281.3.232 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2000.tb00090.x · DOI
- Gershman KA, 1994, Pediatrics, 93, 913, 10.1542/peds.93.6.913 · DOI
- Brogan TV, 1995, Pediatrics, 96, 947
- 10.1097/00005537-200303000-00018 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0007-1226(83)90051-6 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1481803500014494 · DOI
- 10.2460/javma.2000.217.836 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0195-5616(91)50034-6 · DOI
- Nelson KA, 2005, Municipal Lawyer, 46, 12
- 10.1016/j.jpeds.2003.10.024 · DOI
- Sacks JJ, 1996, Pediatrics, 97, 891, 10.1542/peds.97.6.891 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1512 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/jama.1997.03540280016009 · DOI
- Presutti RJ, 2001, Am Fam Physician, 63, 1567
- 10.2460/javma.2001.218.1732 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00431-004-1456-3 · DOI
- 10.1097/PEC.0b013e31822c1112 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.pec.0000280509.67795.a9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.05.005 · DOI
- Méndez Gallart R, 2002, An Esp Pediatr, 56, 425, 10.1016/S1695-4033(02)77839-9 · DOI
- Gandhi RR, 1999, Am Surg, 65, 863, 10.1177/000313489906500911 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Overgaauw, P. A. M., Vinke, C. M., van Hagen, M. A. E., & Lipman, L. J. A. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17113789 · Cited by 301
“8%) of the dogs were known to the children [166].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, H. H., Neumeier, A. T., Davies, B. W., & Durairaj, V. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Denver (US)
- Corresponding author
- Durairaj, Vikram D.
- Venue
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 225-231
- ISSN
- 1943-3875 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3883
- PMC
- PMC3820741
- OpenAlex
- W2029651938
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Traumatic Ocular and Foreign Body Injuries
- Keywords
- dog bites, facial trauma, pediatric injuries, hospitalized children, length of hospital stay, injury prevention, psychosocial burden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review