The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drug-Induced Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia
Abstract
Drug-induced nodular regenerative hyperplasia is an uncommon injury with unique pathophysiology, clinical, and diagnostic considerations. This injury is characteristically asymptomatic in its early phases with only mild elevations in transaminases (< 3× upper limit of normal [ULN]). The latency period is typically more than 6 months. Once clinically apparent, it is marked by complications of portal hypertension, including hypersplenism, ascites, and variceal bleeding, with little or no hepatic dysfunction. Hence, it is an important cause of noncirrhotic portal hypertension. The most commonly associated drugs include thiopurines, chemotherapeutic agents, and antiretroviral agents. Diagnosis is aided by the recognition of noncirrhotic portal hypertension, a detailed history of prior drug exposure, and exclusion of the other causes of nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Clinical history, abdominal imaging, and hepatic hemodynamic studies provide important diagnostic clues, but histologic examination remains the diagnostic gold standard. Therapeutic intervention is aimed at earliest discontinuation of the offending agent and of portal hypertension complications. The natural history varies widely, and portal hypertension can progresses despite drug discontinuation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some cases of chronic DILI develop from the chronicity of acute DILI, while others may be a specific phenotype caused by drugs.
“Clinically, some cases with chronic DILI develop from the chronicity of acute DILI, however, some might be a specific phenotype caused by drugs (e.g., drug-associated fatty liver disease [75], druginduced fibrosis/cirrhosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia [76], drug-induced autoimmune-like hepatitis [DI-ALH], and peliosis hepatis [77]).”
From Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update (2024) · cites this paper as [76]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chinese guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of drug-induced liver injury: an update
Mao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, C., Liu, X., Su, M., Li, D., Li, Y., Chen, G., Chen, J., Chen, J., et al. (2024) · Hepatology International · doi:10.1007/s12072-023-10633-7 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Ghabril, M., & Vuppalanchi, R.
- Venue
- Seminars in Liver Disease
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2014-05-31
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 240-245
- ISSN
- 0272-8087
- 1098-8971
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review