Cited by 42Diabetes Management and ResearchGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication Impact

Changes in Postpartum Insulin Requirements for Patients with Well-Controlled Type 1 Diabetes

Moore, Thomas, Ramos, Gladys, Roeder, Hilary·2016·American Journal of Perinatology

Abstract

Objective To compare postpartum with preconception insulin doses in well-controlled (HbA1c ≤ 7.4%) type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and to characterize differences in postpartum insulin dosing based on infant feeding. Study Design The primary outcome in this retrospective cohort was the change in total daily insulin (TDI) from preconception to postpartum. Insulin administration (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII] vs. multiple daily injections [MDI]), HbA1c, body mass index (BMI), and infant feeding were abstracted. Results We identified 44 women with T1DM and HbA1c ≤ 7.4%. Preconception mean BMI was 24.6 ± 3.6 kg/m(2) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) HbA1c was 6.4 (6.0-6.9)%. Of these, 73% used CSII and 27% used MDI. Additionally, 80% of patients reported exclusive breastfeeding, 7% were exclusively formula feeding, and 13% used both breast milk and formula. Median (IQR) preconception TDI was 0.64 (0.49-0.69) U/kg/day, and postpartum: 0.39 (0.30-0.50) U/kg/day. Postpartum TDI was 34% lower than preconception TDI (p = 0.02). There was no difference in the postpartum TDI in patients who were breast versus formula feeding or when comparing CSII with MDI. Conclusion There was a significant decrease in the TDI required postpartum when compared with preconception. Dosages do not seem to be impacted by administration route or breastfeeding. These findings warrant consideration when dosing postpartum insulin in patients with T1DM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0036-1571323

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore, T., Ramos, G., & Roeder, H.
Affiliations
UC San Diego Health System (US)
Venue
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2016-02-10
Volume
33
Issue
07
Pages
683-687
ISSN
  • 0735-1631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8785
OpenAlex
W2331734149
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Perinatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, breastfeeding, infant feeding, insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections, insulin dose reduction, HbA1c, body mass index
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, California, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Insulin, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Retrospective Studies, Infusion Pumps, Implantable, Body Mass Index, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review