The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement
Abstract
Summary: Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel decreases the rate of stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, despite intensified antiplatelet treatment, up to 4.7% of the patients undergoing coronary stenting develop thrombotic stent occlusion, suggesting incomplete platelet inhibition due to clopidogrel resistance. We evaluated the percentage of clopidogrel nonresponders among 105 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing elective PCI. All patients were treated regularly with aspirin 100 mg/d and received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel followed by a maintenance dose of 75 mg/d before PCI. Clopidogrel non-responders were defined by an inhibition of ADP (5 and 20 μMol/L) induced platelet aggregation that was less than 10% when compared to baseline values 4 h after clopidogrel intake. Semi-responders were identified by an inhibition of 10 to 29%. Patients with an inhibition over 30% were regarded as responders. We found that 5 (ADP 5 μMol/L) to 11% (ADP 20 μMol/L) of the patients were non-responders and 9 to 26% were semi-responders. Among the group of nonresponders there were two incidents of subacute stent thrombosis after PCI. We conclude that a subgroup of patients undergoing PCI does not adequately respond to clopidogrel, which may correspond to the occurrence of thromboischemic complications. Point-of-care testing may help to identify these patients who may then benefit from an alternative antiplatelet therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patrono, C., Coller, B., Dalen, J. E., Fitz Gerald, G. A., Fuster, V., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., & Roth, G. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.39s · Cited by 963
BRANDT, J. T., CLOSE, S. L., ITURRIA, S. J., PAYNE, C. D., FARID, N. A., ERNEST, C. S., LACHNO, D. R., SALAZAR, D., & WINTERS, K. J. (2007) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02775.x · Cited by 734
Price, M. J., Endemann, S., Gollapudi, R. R., Valencia, R., Stinis, C. T., Levisay, J. P., Ernst, A., Sawhney, N. S., Schatz, R. A., & Teirstein, P. S. (2008) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehn046 · Cited by 651
Angiolillo, D. J., Fernandez-Ortiz, A., Bernardo, E., Ramírez, C., Sabaté, M., Jimenez-Quevedo, P., Hernández, R., Moreno, R., Escaned, J., Alfonso, F., et al. (2005) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2430 · Cited by 538
Gurbel, P. A., Bliden, K. P., Zaman, K. A., Yoho, J. A., Hayes, K. M., & Tantry, U. S. (2005) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000157138.02645.11 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Müller, I., Besta, F., Schulz, C., Massberg, S., Schönig, A., & Gawaz, M.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 783-787
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W23524587
- Cited by
- 585
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0037-1613462
- The paper
- Müller, I., Besta, F., Schulz, C., Massberg, S., Schönig, A., & Gawaz, M. (2003). Prevalence of clopidogrel non-responders among patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective coronary stent placement. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1613462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.