Cited by 150Electronic Health Records SystemsNursing Diagnosis and DocumentationMedical Coding and Health Information

Time spent on dedicated patient care and documentation tasks before and after the introduction of a structured and standardized electronic health record

Open access
Joukes, Erik, Abu-Hanna, Ameen, Cornet, Ronald, de Keizer, Nicolette·2018·Applied Clinical Informatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians spend around 35% of their time documenting patient data. They are concerned that adopting a structured and standardized electronic health record (EHR) will lead to more time documenting and less time for patient care, especially during consultations. OBJECTIVE: This study measures the effect of the introduction of a structured and standardized EHR on documentation time and time for dedicated patient care during outpatient consultations. METHODS: We measured physicians' time spent on four task categories during outpatient consultations: documentation, patient care, peer communication, and other activities. Physicians covered various specialties from two university hospitals that jointly implemented a structured and standardized EHR. Preimplementation, one hospital used a legacy-EHR, and one primarily paper-based records. The same physicians were observed 2 to 6 months before and 6 to 8 months after implementation.We analyzed consultation duration, and percentage of time spent on each task category. Differences in time distribution before and after implementation were tested using multilevel linear regression. RESULTS: We observed 24 physicians (162 hours, 439 consultations). We found no significant difference in consultation duration or number of consultations per hour. In the legacy-EHR center, we found the implementation associated with a significant decrease in time spent on dedicated patient care (-8.5%). In contrast, in the previously paper-based center, we found a significant increase in dedicated time spent on documentation (8.3%) and decrease in time on combined patient care and documentation (-4.6%). The effect on dedicated documentation time significantly differed between centers. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a structured and standardized EHR was associated with 8.5% decrease in time for dedicated patient care during consultations in one center and 8.3% increase in dedicated documentation time in another center. These results are in line with physicians' concerns that the introduction of a structured and standardized EHR might lead to more documentation burden and less time for dedicated patient care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0037-1615747

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clinicians must now enter diagnoses into structured EHR fields in addition to clinical notes, effectively duplicating the task.

    “Previously, clinicians documented diagnoses only in clinical notes; today they must also enter them into structured EHR fields, effectively duplicating the task [5].”
  • The additional time spent on documentation is partially explained by the need to document the same information in different formats.

    “This additional time spent is partially explained by the need to document the same information in different formats.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 150

Authors
Joukes, E., Abu-Hanna, A., Cornet, R., & de Keizer, N.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Joukes, Erik
Venue
Applied Clinical Informatics
Published
2018-01
Volume
09
Issue
01
Pages
046-053
ISSN
1869-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783114168
Cited by
150
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
14.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Clinical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, time allocation, outpatient visits, patient care time, paper records, EHR implementation, consultation time, physician workload
MeSH terms
Demography, Documentation, Female, Patient Care, Humans, Male, Physicians, Reference Standards, Referral and Consultation, Regression Analysis, Task Performance and Analysis, Time Factors, User-Computer Interface, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review