Cited by 88Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationThoreau and American Literature

Use and Abuse of Computer-Stored Medical Records

van der Lei, J.·1991·Methods of Information in Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1634831

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 88

Authors
van der Lei, J.
Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
1991
Volume
30
Issue
02
Pages
79-80
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W74774116
Cited by
88
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods of Information in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Netherlands Heart Foundation (88.236)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
electronic health records, patient access to medical records, data privacy, medical records security, health information management
MeSH terms
Physician-Patient Relations, Quality Control, Medical Records Systems, Computerized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review