Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methods of Information in Medicine

Open access
·1988·Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract

Background Multisite research networks such as the project "Collaboration on Rare Diseases" connect various hospitals to obtain sufficient data for clinical research.However, data quality (DQ) remains a challenge for the secondary use of data recorded in different health information systems.High levels of DQ as well as appropriate quality assessment methods are needed to support the reuse of such distributed data.Objectives The aim of this work is the development of an interoperable methodology for assessing the quality of data recorded in heterogeneous sources to improve the quality of rare disease (RD) documentation and support clinical research.Methods We first developed a conceptual framework for DQ assessment.Using this theoretical guidance, we implemented a software framework that provides appropriate tools for calculating DQ metrics and for generating local as well as crossinstitutional reports.We further applied our methodology on synthetic data distributed across multiple hospitals using Personal Health Train.Finally, we used precision and recall as metrics to validate our implementation.Results Four DQ dimensions were defined and represented as disjunct ontological categories.Based on these top dimensions, 9 DQ concepts, 10 DQ indicators, and 25 DQ parameters were developed and applied to different data sets.Randomly introduced DQ issues were all identified and reported automatically.The generated reports show the resulting DQ indicators and detected DQ issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1636640

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Venue
Methods of Information in Medicine
Published
1988-01
Volume
27
Issue
S 01
Pages
01-373
ISSN
  • 0026-1270 (ISSN-L)
  • 2511-705X
OpenAlex
W4247376166
Cited by
238
References
4
FWCI
14.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods of Information in Medicine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0038-1636640
The paper
Methods of Information in Medicine. (1988). Methods of Information in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1636640

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.