The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Patients with Factor VIII Autoantibodies
Abstract
Summary: Thirty-one non-hemophilic patients with acquired antibodies to factor VIII were entered into a prospective, randomized, multi- institutional trial to determine the safety and efficacy of prednisone (P), cyclophosphamide ©, or the combination in the treatment of this disorder. Patients were eligible if they had antibody demonstrated by the Bethesda assay, had not received these agents previously, and gave informed consent. All patients were treated initially with P, 1 mg/kg, for 3 weeks. If the antibody persisted and there was no rise in factor VIII activity, patients were randomized to either continue P for an additional 6 weeks; taper P and begin C, 2 mg per kg; or continue P and add C. Antibody disappeared in 10 during the initial P therapy, and in three of four others randomized to continue on P; one patient was discontinued because of an herpetic infection. Antibody disappeared in three of six patients treated with C alone, and five of ten given C and P. The titer of antibody was significantly lower in responders than in non-responders (p = 0.003), but seven patients with titers of more than five Bethesda units had complete remissions. There was no difference in antibody titers between those responding to P and those responding to C. We conclude that all patients with acquired antibodies to factor VIII should receive initial management with P, and that C is effective as second-line therapy for many of those who are steroid-resistant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tiede, A., Klamroth, R., Scharf, R. E., Trappe, R. U., Holstein, K., Huth-Kühne, A., Gottstein, S., Geisen, U., Schenk, J., Scholz, U., et al. (2015) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-07-587089 · Cited by 295
Diagnosis and management of acquired coagulation inhibitors: a guideline from UKHCDO
W Collins, P., Chalmers, E., Hart, D., Jennings, I., Liesner, R., Rangarajan, S., Talks, K., Williams, M., & R. M. Hay, C. (2013) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.12463 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, D., Rademaker, A. W., & Briët, E.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 753-757
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W2427589464
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Patients with Factor VIII Autoantibodies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0038-1649664
- The paper
- Green, D., Rademaker, A. W., & Briët, E. (1993). A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Prednisone and Cyclophosphamide in the Treatment of Patients with Factor VIII Autoantibodies. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1649664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.