The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Oral anticoagulant therapy has been shown to be effective for several indications. The optimal intensity of anticoagulation for each indication, however, is largely unknown. To determine this optimal intensity, randomised clinical trials are conducted in which two target levels of anticoagulation are compared. This approach is inefficient, since the choice of the target levels will be arbitrary. Moreover, the achieved intensity is not taken into account. We propose a method to determine the optimal achieved intensity of anticoagulation. This method can be applied within a clinical trial as an “efficacy-analysis”, but also on data gathered in day-to-day patient care. In this method, INR-specific incidence rates of events, either thromboembolic or hemorrhagic, are calculated. The numerator of the incidence rate is based on data on the INR at the time of the event. The denominator consists of the person-time at each INR value, summed over all patients, and is calculated from all INR measurements of all patients during the follow-up interval. This INR-specific person-time is calculated with the assumption of a linear increase or decrease between two consecutive INR determinations. Since the incidence rates may be substratified on covariates, efficient assessment of the effects of other factors (e.g. age, sex, comedication) by multivariate regression analysis becomes possible. This method allows the determination of the optimal pharmacological effects of anticoagulation, which can form a rational starting point for choosing the target levels in subsequent clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
Connolly, S. J., Ezekowitz, M. D., Yusuf, S., Eikelboom, J., Oldgren, J., Parekh, A., Pogue, J., Reilly, P. A., Themeles, E., Varrone, J., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0905561 · Cited by 11,215
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
Patel, M. R., Mahaffey, K. W., Garg, J., Pan, G., Singer, D. E., Hacke, W., Breithardt, G., Halperin, J. L., Hankey, G. J., Piccini, J. P., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1009638 · Cited by 9,430
Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
Granger, C. B., Alexander, J. H., McMurray, J. J. V., Lopes, R. D., Hylek, E. M., Hanna, M., Al-Khalidi, H. R., Ansell, J., Atar, D., Avezum, A., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1107039 · Cited by 8,943
Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation
Giugliano, R. P., Ruff, C. T., Braunwald, E., Murphy, S. A., Wiviott, S. D., Halperin, J. L., Waldo, A. L., Ezekowitz, M. D., Weitz, J. I., Špinar, J., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1310907 · Cited by 5,164
Oral Apixaban for the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
Agnelli, G., Buller, H. R., Cohen, A., Curto, M., Gallus, A. S., Johnson, M., Masiukiewicz, U., Pak, R., Thompson, J., Raskob, G. E., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1302507 · Cited by 2,324
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosendaal, F. R., Cannegieter, S. C., van der Meer, F. J. M., & Briët, E.
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 03
- Pages
- 236-239
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W1586488555
- Cited by
- 2,065
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0038-1651587
- The paper
- Rosendaal, F. R., Cannegieter, S. C., van der Meer, F. J. M., & Briët, E. (1993). A Method to Determine the Optimal Intensity of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1651587
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.