The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Utilization of FEIBA in France in Patients with Factor VIII and Factor IX Inhibitors
Abstract
Summary: Factor VIII or factor IX replacement is frequently impossible in inhibitor-developing hemophiliacs, because of the level of the inhibitor titer. Activated prothrombin complex concentrates are one of the available options to treat the bleeding episodes in such patients. However, the efficacy of these products and the associated thrombogenic risk, particularly in prolonged administration such as employed during surgeries, are important concerns for hemophilia care providers. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the use of FEIBA (Factor Eight Bypassing Activity) in France, and data is presented on 433 bleeding episodes, including surgical procedures, concerning 60 patients from 15 hemophilia centers. The efficacy was judged as good or excellent in 352 episodes (81.3%), poor in 73 episodes (16.9%) and non-existent in 8 episodes (1.8%). Minor and major surgical procedures were successfully performed using FEIBA as a second-line therapy after human or porcine factor VIII, and in some occasions FEIBA was utilized as the only substitution product. The tolerance was assessed as good in 428 episodes (98.8%), but in 5 cases adverse effects were reported. Only 3 patients out of 52 regularly evaluated (5.8%) were HIV-seropositive, and for two of them the seroconversion occurred prior to the first use of FEIBA. In contrast, 80.4% of the patients were HCV-seropositive. An anamnestic response after the administration of FEIBA was noted in 31.5% of cases. This study points out the main features of the use of FEIBA in France, and particularly the low HIV seroprevalence in the patients treated. The good efficacy and the excellent tolerance still confer to this product a place to consider in the therapeutic options for the treatment of inhibitor-developing hemophiliacs or in acquired hemophilia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lusher, J. M., Arkin, S., Abildgaard, C. F., & Schwartz, R. S. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199302183280701 · Cited by 476
Cited by
The past and future of haemophilia: diagnosis, treatments, and its complications
Peyvandi, F., Garagiola, I., & Young, G. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01123-x · Cited by 505
Darby, S. C., Keeling, D. M., Spooner, R. J. D., Wan Kan, S., Giangrande, P. L. F., Collins, P. W., Hill, F. G. H., & Hay, C. R. M. (2004) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1046/j.1538-7836.2004.00710.x · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Negrier, C., Goudemand, J., Sultan, Y., Bertrand, M., Rothschild, C., Lauroua, P., & the members of the French FEIBA study group
- Venue
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 06
- Pages
- 1113-1119
- ISSN
- 0340-6245 (ISSN-L)
- 2567-689X
- OpenAlex
- W58047943
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Utilization of FEIBA in France in Patients with Factor VIII and Factor IX Inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0038-1656122
- The paper
- Negrier, C., Goudemand, J., Sultan, Y., Bertrand, M., Rothschild, C., Lauroua, P., & the members of the French FEIBA study group. (1997). Multicenter Retrospective Study on the Utilization of FEIBA in France in Patients with Factor VIII and Factor IX Inhibitors. Thrombosis and Haemostasis. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.