Cited by 78Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismVoice and Speech Disorders

Assessment of individuals with primary progressive aphasia

Open access
Grasso, Stephanie, Henry, Maya·2018·Seminars in Speech and Language

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists play a crucial role in the assessment and treatment of individuals with primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The speech-language evaluation is a critical aspect of the diagnostic and rehabilitative process, informing differential diagnosis as well as intervention planning and monitoring of cognitive-linguistic status over time. The evaluation should include a thorough case history and interview and a detailed assessment of speech-language and cognitive functions, with tasks designed to detect core and associated deficits outlined in current diagnostic criteria. In this paper, we review assessments that can be utilized to examine communication and cognition in PPA, including general aphasia batteries designed for stroke and/or progressive aphasia as well as tests of specific cognitive-linguistic functions, including naming, object/person knowledge, single-word and sentence comprehension, repetition, spontaneous speech/language production, motor speech, written language, and nonlinguistic cognitive domains. The comprehensive evaluation can inform diagnostic decision making and facilitate planning of interventions that are tailored to the patient's current status and likely progression of deficits. As such, the speech-language evaluation allows the medical team to provide individuals with PPA and their families with appropriate recommendations for the present and the future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0038-1660782

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 65 · Cited by 78

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [14]Kertesz A Western Aphasia Battery™—Revised (WAB–R™). San Antonio, Tx: Pearson Clinical; 2006
  2. [15]Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B, Weintraub S, Segal O. The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE). 3rd ed Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001
  3. [64]Kukull W, Knopman D, Mesulam MM, Standardized data collection and diagnostic formulation for FTLD clinical exam: The FTLD Module. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012; 34: 226– 227

Authors
Grasso, S., & Henry, M.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Henry, Maya
Venue
Seminars in Speech and Language
Published
2018-06-22
Volume
39
Issue
03
Pages
231-241
ISSN
  • 0734-0478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-9056
OpenAlex
W2809188665
Cited by
78
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Speech and Language (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F31DC016229, R03DC013403, R01DC016291)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
primary progressive aphasia, speech and language assessment, differential diagnosis, naming, sentence comprehension, repetition, spontaneous speech production, motor speech, written language, intervention planning
MeSH terms
Cognition, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Language, Linguistics, Neuropsychological Tests, Speech-Language Pathology, Aphasia, Primary Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review