Deep Learning on 1-D Biosignals: a Taxonomy-based Survey
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: Deep learning models such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been applied successfully to medical imaging, but biomedical signal analysis has yet to fully benefit from this novel approach. Our survey aims at (i) reviewing deep learning techniques for biosignal analysis in computer- aided diagnosis; and (ii) deriving a taxonomy for organizing the growing number of applications in the field. Methods: A comprehensive literature research was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and ACM. Deep learning models were classified with respect to the (i) origin, (ii) dimension, and (iii) type of the biosignal as input to the deep learning model; (iv) the goal of the application; (v) the size and (vi) type of ground truth data; (vii) the type and (viii) schedule of learning the network; and (ix) the topology of the model. Results: Between January 2010 and December 2017, a total 71 papers were published on the topic. The majority (n = 36) of papers are on electrocariography (ECG) signals. Most applications (n = 25) aim at detection of patterns, while only a few (n = 6) at predection of events. Out of 36 ECG-based works, many (n = 17) relate to multi-lead ECG. Other biosignals that have been identified in the survey are electromyography, phonocardiography, photoplethysmography, electrooculography, continuous glucose monitoring, acoustic respiratory signal, blood pressure, and electrodermal activity signal, while ballistocardiography or seismocardiography have yet to be analyzed using deep learning techniques. In supervised and unsupervised applications, CNNs and restricted Boltzmann machines are the most and least frequently used, (n = 34) and (n = 15), respectively. Conclusion: Our key-code classification of relevant papers was used to cluster the approaches that have been published to date and demonstrated a large variability of research with respect to data, application, and network topology. Future research is expected to focus on the standardization of deep learning architectures and on the optimization of the network parameters to increase performance and robustness. Furthermore, application-driven approaches and updated training data from mobile recordings are needed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Healthcare applications of deep learning range from one-dimensional biosignal analysis and prediction of medical events to computer-aided detection and diagnosis, drug discovery, therapy selection, operational efficiency, stratified care delivery, and analysis of electronic health records.
“Healthcare applications of deep learning range from one-dimensional biosignal analysis [17] and the prediction of medical events, e.g. seizures [18] and cardiac arrests [19], to computer-aided detection [20] and diagnosis [21] supporting clinical decision making and survival analysis [22], to drug discovery [23] and as an aid in therapy selection and pharmacogenomics [24], to increased operational”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
The tremendous amounts of high-impact publications in top journals dealing with deep learning in medical imaging illustrate the value of the methods.
“This is illustrated by the tremendous amounts of high-impact publications in top-journals dealing with deep learning in medical imaging (for example [17, 21, 30, 32, 40, 90, 162, 137, 140, 273, 285], all published in 2018).”
From An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI (2019) · cites this paper as [17]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Ganapathy, N., Swaminathan, R., & Deserno, T.
- Affiliations
- Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
- Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Deserno, Thomas
- Venue
- Yearbook of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 098-109
- ISSN
- 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-0502
- PMC
- PMC6115218
- OpenAlex
- W2889042945
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Yearbook of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- deep learning, biomedical signal processing, convolutional neural networks, computer-aided diagnosis, electrocardiogram, electromyography, phonocardiography, photoplethysmography, electrooculography, continuous glucose monitoring, respiratory signals, blood pressure, electrodermal activity, restricted Boltzmann machine, pattern detection, event prediction
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Electrocardiography, Electrodiagnosis, Humans, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review