The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols
Open accessAbstract
Pain control is an integral part of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) protocols for colorectal surgery. While opioid therapy remains the mainstay of therapy for postsurgical pain, opioids have undesired side effects including delayed recovery of bowel function, respiratory depression, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. A variety of nonopioid systemic medical therapies as well as regional and neuraxial techniques have been described as improving pain control while reducing opioid use. Multimodal and preemptive analgesia as part of an ERAS protocol facilitates early mobility and early return of bowel function and decreases postoperative morbidity. In this review, we examine several multimodal therapies and their impact on postoperative analgesia, opioid use, and recovery for patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery
Charlton, S., Cyna, A. M., Middleton, P., & Griffiths, J. D. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007705.pub2 · Cited by 270
RetractedA Factorial Trial of Six Interventions for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Apfel, C. C., Korttila, K., Abdalla, M., Kerger, H., Turan, A., Vedder, I., Zernak, C., Danner, K., Jokela, R., Pocock, S. J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032196 · Cited by 1,553
Lassen, K. (2009) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.170 · Cited by 1,096
Efficacy of Postoperative Epidural Analgesia: A Meta-analysis
Block, B. M., Liu, S. S., Rowlingson, A. J., Cowan, A. R., Cowan, Jr., & Wu, C. L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.18.2455 · Cited by 986
Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting
Apfel, C. C., Heidrich, F. M., Jukar-Rao, S., Jalota, L., Hornuss, C., Whelan, R. P., Zhang, K., & Cakmakkaya, O. S. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes276 · Cited by 864
Waldron, N. H., Jones, C. A., Gan, T. J., Allen, T. K., & Habib, A. S. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes431 · Cited by 659
Ong, C. K. S., Seymour, R. A., Lirk, P., & Merry, A. F. (2010) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181cf9281 · Cited by 631
A systematic review of intravenous ketamine for postoperative analgesia
Laskowski, K., Stirling, A., McKay, W. P., & Lim, H. J. (2011) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-011-9560-0 · Cited by 574
Blaudszun, G., Lysakowski, C., Elia, N., & Tramèr, M. R. (2012) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31825681cb · Cited by 554
Pöpping, D. M., Elia, N., Van Aken, H. K., Marret, E., Schug, S. A., Kranke, P., Wenk, M., & Tramèr, M. R. (2014) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000237 · Cited by 519
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpson, J., Bao, X., & Agarwala, A.
- Venue
- Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2019-02-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 121-128
- ISSN
- 1521-5741 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-0043
- 1530-9681
- OpenAlex
- W2918212061
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 19.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0038-1676477
- The paper
- Simpson, J., Bao, X., & Agarwala, A. (2019). Pain Management in Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Protocols. Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
