Cited by 57Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsLiver physiology and pathologyLiver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Mechanotransduction in Liver Diseases

Open access
Kang, Ningling·2020·Seminars in Liver Disease

Abstract

Chronic liver diseases, such as fibrosis and cancer, lead to a rigid or stiff liver because of perpetual activation of hepatic stellate cells or portal fibroblasts into matrix-producing myofibroblasts. Mechanical forces, as determined by the mechanical properties of extracellular matrix or pressure of circulating blood flow/shear stress, are sensed by mechanoreceptors at the plasma membrane and transmitted into a cell to impact cell function. This process is termed as mechanotransduction. This review includes basic knowledge regarding how external forces are sensed, amplified, and transmitted into the interior of a cell as far as the nucleus to regulate gene transcription and generate biological responses. It also reviews literatures to highlight the mechanisms by which mechanical forces in a normal or diseased liver influence the phenotype of hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells, portal fibroblasts, and sinusoidal endothelial cells, and these cells in turn participate in the initiation and progression of liver diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0039-3399502

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HSCs are capable of moving and clustering in more rigid regions via mechanical signaling pathways, subsequently leading to further stiffening of the ECM.

    “HSCs are capable of moving and clustering in more rigid regions via mechanical signaling pathways, subsequently leading to further stiffening of the ECM.63”
  • Liver stiffness influences resident liver cells through mechanotransduction, promoting a sustained fibrotic response and contributing to a pathological liver environment.

    “Additionally, liver stiffness influences resident liver cells through mechanotransduction, promoting a sustained fibrotic response and contributing to the formation of a pathological liver environment.63”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 57

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. [1]Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in regulating cell behavior. Hepatology. 2008; 47(4): 1394– 1400. 18307210
  2. [2]Venkatesh SK, Ehman RL. Magnetic resonance elastography of liver. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2014; 22(3): 433– 446. 25086938 PMC8525633
  3. [3]Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bello B, Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology. 2012; 56(6): 2125– 2133. 22767302
  4. [4]Friedman SL. Mechanisms of disease: Mechanisms of hepatic fibrosis and therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 1(2): 98– 105. 16265071
  5. [5]Olsen AL, Bloomer SA, Chan EP, Hepatic stellate cells require a stiff environment for myofibroblastic differentiation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2011; 301(1): G110– 118. 21527725 PMC3129929
  6. [6]Bosch-Fortea M, Martin-Belmonte F. Mechanosensitive adhesion complexes in epithelial architecture and cancer onset. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2018; 50: 42– 49. 29454273
  7. [7]Lachowski D, Cortes E, Robinson B, Rice A, Rombouts K, Del Rio Hernandez AE. FAK controls the mechanical activation of YAP, a transcriptional regulator required for durotaxis. FASEB J. 2018; 32(2): 1099– 1107. 29070586
  8. [8]Lachowski D, Cortes E, Pink D, Substrate Rigidity Controls Activation and Durotaxis in Pancreatic Stellate Cells. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 2506. 28566691 PMC5451433
  9. [9]Gkretsi V, Stylianopoulos T. Cell Adhesion and Matrix Stiffness: Coordinating Cancer Cell Invasion and Metastasis. Front Oncol. 2018; 8: 145. 29780748 PMC5945811
  10. [10]Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8(3): 241– 254. 16169468
  11. [11]Xu Z, Vonlaufen A, Phillips PA, Role of pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic cancer metastasis. Am J Pathol. 2010; 177(5): 2585– 2596. 20934972 PMC2966814
  12. [13]Lim CG, Jang J, Kim C. Cellular machinery for sensing mechanical force. BMB Rep. 2018; 51(12): 623– 629. 30293551 PMC6330935
  13. [14]Mathieu S, Manneville JB. Intracellular mechanics: connecting rheology and mechanotransduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2019; 56: 34– 44. 30253328
  14. [15]Tucker GC. Inhibitors of integrins. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2002; 2(4): 394– 402. 12127872
  15. [16]Bouvard D, Pouwels J, De Franceschi N, Ivaska J. Integrin inactivators: balancing cellular functions in vitro and in vivo. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013; 14(7): 430– 442. 23719537
  16. [17]Alberts BJA, Lewis J, Molecular Biology of the Cell. 4th edition. 2002.
  17. [18]Brakebusch C, Bouvard D, Stanchi F, Sakai T, Fassler R. Integrins in invasive growth. J Clin Invest. 2002; 109(8): 999– 1006. 11956235 PMC150953
  18. [19]Thumkeo D, Watanabe S, Narumiya S. Physiological roles of Rho and Rho effectors in mammals. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013; 92(10-11): 303– 315. 24183240
  19. [20]Fassler R, Meyer M. Consequences of lack of beta 1 integrin gene expression in mice. Genes Dev. 1995; 9(15): 1896– 1908. 7544313
  20. [21]Speicher T, Siegenthaler B, Bogorad RL, Knockdown and knockout of beta1-integrin in hepatocytes impairs liver regeneration through inhibition of growth factor signalling. Nat Commun. 2014; 5: 3862. 24844558
  21. [22]Coelho NM, McCulloch CA. Mechanical signaling through the discoidin domain receptor 1 plays a central role in tissue fibrosis. Cell Adh Migr. 2018; 12(4): 348– 362. 29513135 PMC6363045
  22. [23]Ingber DE. Tensegrity: the architectural basis of cellular mechanotransduction. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997; 59: 575– 599. 9074778
  23. [24]Klezovitch O, Vasioukhin V. Cadherin signaling: keeping cells in touch. F1000Res. 2015; 4(F1000 Faculty Rev): 550. 26339481 PMC4544379
  24. [25]St Croix B, Sheehan C, Rak JW, Florenes VA, Slingerland JM, Kerbel RS. E-Cadherin-dependent growth suppression is mediated by the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27(KIP1). J Cell Biol. 1998; 142(2): 557– 571. 9679152 PMC2133056
  25. [26]Perl AK, Wilgenbus P, Dahl U, Semb H, Christofori G. A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature. 1998; 392(6672): 190– 193. 9515965
  26. [27]Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature. 2005; 437(7057): 426– 431. 16163360
  27. [28]Conway DE, Breckenridge MT, Hinde E, Gratton E, Chen CS, Schwartz MA. Fluid shear stress on endothelial cells modulates mechanical tension across VE-cadherin and PECAM-1. Curr Biol. 2013; 23(11): 1024– 1030. 23684974 PMC3676707
  28. [29]Sukharev SI, Blount P, Martinac B, Blattner FR, Kung C. A large-conductance mechanosensitive channel in E. coli encoded by mscL alone. Nature. 1994; 368(6468): 265– 268. 7511799
  29. [30]Patel AJ, Honore E, Maingret F, A mammalian two pore domain mechano-gated S-like K+ channel. EMBO J. 1998; 17(15): 4283– 4290. 9687497 PMC1170762
  30. [31]Maingret F, Fosset M, Lesage F, Lazdunski M, Honore E. TRAAK is a mammalian neuronal mechano-gated K+ channel. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(3): 1381– 1387. 9880510
  31. [32]Lesage F, Maingret F, Lazdunski M. Cloning and expression of human TRAAK, a polyunsaturated fatty acids-activated and mechano-sensitive K(+) channel. FEBS Lett. 2000; 471(2-3): 137– 140. 10767409
  32. [33]Parpaite T, Coste B. Piezo channels. Curr Biol. 2017; 27(7): R250– R252. 28376327
  33. [34]Ingber DE, Madri JA, Folkman J. Endothelial growth factors and extracellular matrix regulate DNA synthesis through modulation of cell and nuclear expansion. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol. 1987; 23(5): 387– 394. 2438264
  34. [35]Haase K, Macadangdang JK, Edrington CH, Extracellular Forces Cause the Nucleus to Deform in a Highly Controlled Anisotropic Manner. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 21300. 26892269 PMC4759536
  35. [36]Elosegui-Artola A, Andreu I, Beedle AEM, Force Triggers YAP Nuclear Entry by Regulating Transport across Nuclear Pores. Cell. 2017; 171(6): 1397– 1410 e1314. 29107331
  36. [37]Tajik A, Zhang Y, Wei F, Transcription upregulation via force-induced direct stretching of chromatin. Nat Mater. 2016; 15(12): 1287– 1296. 27548707 PMC5121013
  37. [38]Hansen LK, Wilhelm J, Fassett JT. Regulation of hepatocyte cell cycle progression and differentiation by type I collagen structure. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2006; 72: 205– 236. 16564336
  38. [39]Görtzen J, Schierwagen R, Bierwolf J, Interplay of matrix stiffness and c-SRC in hepatic fibrosis. Frontiers in physiology. 2015; 6: 359. 26696895 PMC4667086
  39. [40]Desai SS, Tung JC, Zhou VX, Physiological ranges of matrix rigidity modulate primary mouse hepatocyte function in part through hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha. Hepatology. 2016; 64(1): 261– 275. 26755329 PMC5224931
  40. [41]Xia T, Zhao R, Feng F, Gene expression profiling of human hepatocytes grown on differing substrate stiffness. Biotechnol Lett. 2018; 40(5): 809– 818. 29605939
  41. [42]Schrader J, Gordon-Walker TT, Aucott RL, Matrix stiffness modulates proliferation, chemotherapeutic response, and dormancy in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2011; 53(4): 1192– 1205. 21442631 PMC3076070
  42. [43]Gao J, Rong Y, Huang Y, Cirrhotic stiffness affects the migration of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and induces sorafenib resistance through YAP. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234(3): 2639– 2648. 30145835
  43. [44]Zhao G, Cui J, Qin Q, Mechanical stiffness of liver tissues in relation to integrin beta1 expression may influence the development of hepatic cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2010; 102(5): 482– 489. 20872952
  44. [45]Nakagomi R, Tateishi R, Masuzaki R, Liver stiffness measurements in chronic hepatitis C: Treatment evaluation and risk assessment. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019; 34(5): 921– 928. 30393960
  45. [46]Dou C, Liu Z, Tu K, P300 Acetyltransferase Mediates Stiffness-Induced Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cells Into Tumor-Promoting Myofibroblasts. Gastroenterology. 2018; 154(8): 2209– 2221 e2214. 29454793 PMC6039101
  46. [47]Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic fibrogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2008; 134(6): 1655– 1669. 18471545 PMC2888539
  47. [48]Liu C, Billadeau DD, Abdelhakim H, IQGAP1 suppresses TbetaRII-mediated myofibroblastic activation and metastatic growth in liver. J Clin Invest. 2013; 123(3): 1138– 1156. 23454766 PMC3582119
  48. [49]Li Z, Dranoff JA, Chan EP, Uemura M, Sevigny J, Wells RG. Transforming growth factor-beta and substrate stiffness regulate portal fibroblast activation in culture. Hepatology. 2007; 46(4): 1246– 1256. 17625791
  49. [51]Martin K, Pritchett J, Llewellyn J, PAK proteins and YAP-1 signalling downstream of integrin beta-1 in myofibroblasts promote liver fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2016; 7: 12502. 27535340 PMC4992158
  50. [52]Swiderska-Syn M, Xie G, Michelotti GA, Hedgehog regulates yes-associated protein 1 in regenerating mouse liver. Hepatology. 2016; 64(1): 232– 244. 26970079 PMC4917408
  51. [53]Simonetto DA, Yang HY, Yin M, Chronic passive venous congestion drives hepatic fibrogenesis via sinusoidal thrombosis and mechanical forces. Hepatology. 2015; 61(2): 648– 659. 25142214 PMC4303520
  52. [54]Zhao XH, Laschinger C, Arora P, Szaszi K, Kapus A, McCulloch CA. Force activates smooth muscle alpha-actin promoter activity through the Rho signaling pathway. J Cell Sci. 2007; 120(Pt 10): 1801– 1809. 17456553
  53. [56]Foster CT, Gualdrini F, Treisman R. Mutual dependence of the MRTF-SRF and YAP-TEAD pathways in cancer-associated fibroblasts is indirect and mediated by cytoskeletal dynamics. Genes Dev. 2017; 31(23-24): 2361– 2375. 29317486 PMC5795783
  54. [57]Wang Y, Tu K, Liu D, p300 Acetyltransferase Is a Cytoplasm-to-Nucleus Shuttle for SMAD2/3 and TAZ Nuclear Transport in Transforming Growth Factor beta-Stimulated Hepatic Stellate Cells. Hepatology. 2019. PMC6783326 31004519
  55. [58]Hata S, Hirayama J, Kajiho H, A novel acetylation cycle of transcription co-activator Yes-associated protein that is downstream of Hippo pathway is triggered in response to SN2 alkylating agents. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287(26): 22089– 22098. 22544757 PMC3381167
  56. [60]Lorenz L, Axnick J, Buschmann T, Mechanosensing by beta1 integrin induces angiocrine signals for liver growth and survival. Nature. 2018; 562(7725): 128– 132. 30258227
  57. [61]Rafii S, Butler JM, Ding BS. Angiocrine functions of organ-specific endothelial cells. Nature. 2016; 529(7586): 316– 325. 26791722 PMC4878406
  58. [62]Hilscher MB, Sehrawat T, Arab Verdugo JP, Mechanical Stretch Increases Expression of CXCL1 in Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells to Recruit Neutrophils, Generate Sinusoidal Microthombi, and Promote Portal Hypertension. Gastroenterology. 2019. PMC6581607 30872106
  59. [63]Liu L, You Z, Yu H, Mechanotransduction-modulated fibrotic microniches reveal the contribution of angiogenesis in liver fibrosis. Nat Mater. 2017; 16(12): 1252– 1261. 29170554

Authors
Kang, N.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Kang, Ningling
Venue
Seminars in Liver Disease
Published
2019-11-04
Volume
40
Issue
01
Pages
084-090
ISSN
  • 0272-8087 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-8971
OpenAlex
W2984273484
Cited by
57
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Seminars in Liver Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
NIH (R01 CA160069)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
mechanotransduction, liver fibrosis, liver cancer, hepatic stellate cells, portal fibroblasts, myofibroblast activation, extracellular matrix stiffness, shear stress, mechanoreceptors, gene transcription, hepatocyte phenotype, sinusoidal endothelial cells, liver disease progression
MeSH terms
Animals, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Liver Diseases, Hepatocytes, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, Myofibroblasts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review