The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Patient Identification Techniques – Approaches, Implications, and Findings
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To identify current patient identification techniques and approaches used worldwide in today’s healthcare environment. To identify challenges associated with improper patient identification. Methods: A literature review of relevant peer-reviewed and grey literature published from January 2015 to October 2019 was conducted to inform the paper. The focus was on: 1) patient identification techniques and 2) unintended consequences and ramifications of unresolved patient identification issues. Results: The literature review showed six common patient identification techniques implemented worldwide ranging from unique patient identifiers, algorithmic approaches, referential matching software, biometrics, radio frequency identification device (RFID) systems, and hybrid models. The review revealed three themes associated with unresolved patient identification: 1) treatment, care delivery, and patient safety errors, 2) cost and resource considerations, and 3) data sharing and interoperability challenges. Conclusions: Errors in patient identification have implications for patient care and safety, payment, as well as data sharing and interoperability. Different patient identification techniques ranging from unique patient identifiers and algorithms to hybrid models have been implemented worldwide. However, no current patient identification techniques have resulted in a 100% match rate. Optimizing algorithmic matching through data standardization and referential matching software should be studied further to identify opportunities to enhance patient identification techniques and approaches. Further efforts to improve patient identity management include adoption of patients’ photos at registration, naming conventions, and standardized processes for recording patients’ demographic data attributes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with Riplinger et al. [41], who demonstrated that failure to perform it appropriately can compromise clinical decision-making, reduce treatment effectiveness, jeopardize patient outcomes and privacy.”
From Patient safety risk associated with synchronous telehealth: A scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [41]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 91
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- P Ranade-Kharkar, 2014, Improving Clinical Data Integrity by using Data Adjudication Techniques for Data Received through a Health Information Exchange (HIE), AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 2014, 1894
- D MacIvor, 2009, Enhanced detection of blood bank sample collection errors with a centralized patient database, Transfusion, 49, 40, 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01923.x · DOI
- M A McClellan, 2009, Duplicate medical records: a survey of Twin Cities healthcare organizations, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, 14, 421
- A Paez, 2017, Gray literature: An important resource in systematic reviews, J Evid Based Med, 10, 233, 10.1111/jebm.12266 · DOI · Paper page
- E C Cheng, 2018, Healthcare services across China – on implementing an extensible universally unique patient identifier system, International Journal of Healthcare Management, 11, 210, 10.1080/20479700.2017.1398388 · DOI
- P Waruhari, 2017, A Review of Current Patient Matching Techniques, Stud Health Technol Inform, 238, 205
- S J Grannis, 2019, Evaluating the effect of data standardization and validation on patient matching accuracy, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 26, 447, 10.1093/jamia/ocy191 · DOI
- A J Holmgren, 2017, Health information exchange in US hospitals: The current landscape and a path to improved information sharing, J Hosp Med, 12, 193, 10.12788/jhm.2704 · DOI
- T H Tase, 2018, Evaluation of the risk of misidentification of women in a public maternity hospital, Rev Bras Enferm, 71, 120, 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0134 · DOI
- A Rinaldi, 2016, Biometrics’ new identity—measuring more physical and biological traits: Research into the characteristics that are unique to an individual is addressing the need to correctly identify people in a variety of medical, social and security context, EMBO Rep, 17, 22, 10.15252/embr.201541677 · DOI
- J Deliversky, 2018, Ethical and Legal Considerations in Biometric Data Usage—Bulgarian Perspective, Front Public Health, 6, 25, 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00025 · DOI
- X M Meijome Sánchez, 2016, Patient identification errors, Enferm Clin, 21, 295, 10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.07.006 · DOI
- A B McCoy, 2013, Matching identifiers in electronic health records: implications for duplicate records and patient safety, BMJ Qual Saf, 22, 219, 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001419 · DOI
- B H Just, 2016, Why Patient Matching is a Challenge: Research on Master Patient Index (MPI) Data Discrepancies in Key Identifying Fields, Perspect Health Inf Manag, 13, 1e
- J Adelman, 2015, Use of Temportary Names for Newborns and Associated Risks, Pediatrics, 136, 327, 10.1542/peds.2015-0007 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Riplinger, L., Piera-Jiménez, J., & Dooling, J. P.
- Affiliations
- American Health Information Management Association (US)
- Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Riplinger, Lauren
- ORCID
- Piera-Jiménez, Jordi
- Venue
- Yearbook of Medical Informatics
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 081-086
- ISSN
- 0943-4747 (ISSN-L)
- 2364-0502
- PMC
- PMC7442501
- OpenAlex
- W3081486306
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 7.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Yearbook of Medical Informatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Quality and Management
- Keywords
- patient identification, unique patient identifiers, biometrics, radio frequency identification, algorithmic matching, data interoperability, data sharing
- MeSH terms
- Health Smart Cards, Health Information Interoperability, Algorithms, Humans, Patient Identification Systems, Software, Information Dissemination, Patient Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Identification Techniques – Approaches, Implications, and Findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1055/s-0040-1701984
- The paper
- Riplinger, L., Piera-Jiménez, J., & Dooling, J. P. (2020). Patient Identification Techniques – Approaches, Implications, and Findings. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701984