The Compliance of Prescribed Activity Restriction in Women at High Risk for Preterm Birth
Abstract
Objective Despite lack of evidence to support efficacy, activity restriction is one of the most commonly prescribed interventions used for the prevention of preterm birth. We have a departmental policy against the use of activity restriction but many practitioners still prescribe it in an effort to prevent preterm birth. We sought to evaluate the rate and compliance of women who are prescribed activity restriction during pregnancy to prevent preterm birth. Study design This was a single-site retrospective questionnaire study at a tertiary care, academic affiliated medical center. Women with a history of preterm delivery or short cervix were included. Once patients were identified, each patient was contacted and administered a questionnaire. We assessed the rates of activity restriction prescription and compliance. Secondary outcomes included details regarding activity restriction and treatment in pregnancy. Continuous variables were compared with t -test and categorical variables with Chi-square test. The value p Results Among the 52 women who responded to the questionnaire, 18 reported being placed on activity restriction by a physician, with 1 self-prescribing activity restriction, giving a rate of our primary outcome of 19 of 52 (36.5%). All women reported compliance with prescribed activity restriction (100%). Gestational age at delivery was not different in women placed on activity restriction. Conclusion This questionnaire suggests that approximately one in three high-r…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Approximately one third of high-risk pregnant individuals were placed on activity restriction despite a departmental policy against it.
“approximately one third of high-risk pregnant individuals were placed on activity restriction despite a departmental policy against it [16].”
From Activity Restriction and Hospitalization in Pregnancy: Can Bed-Rest Exercise Prevent Deconditioning? A Narrative Review (2023) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 8
- Authors
- Bitar, G., & Sciscione, A.
- Affiliations
- Christiana Care Health System (US)
- Delaware Center for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Newark, Delaware
- Corresponding author
- Bitar, Ghamar
- ORCID
- Bitar, Ghamar
- Venue
- American Journal of Perinatology
- Publisher
- Georg Thieme Verlag KG
- Published
- 2020-07-23
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 054-060
- ISSN
- 0735-1631 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-8785
- OpenAlex
- W3044799509
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Perinatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- activity limitation, preterm birth prevention, high-risk pregnancy, prescription compliance, physician prescribing patterns, short cervix, departmental policy, gestational age at delivery
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bed Rest, Female, Humans, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Retrospective Studies, Exercise, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review