Cited by 43Toxoplasma gondii Research StudiesOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeOcular Infections and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ocular Toxoplasmosis: an Update

Garweg, J.·2016·Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the seroprevalence of toxoplasmosis has undergone a progressive 50 % decline during the past 20 years, the disease remains an economically important health hazard in many countries. Ocular toxoplasmosis (OT) is the most frequent cause of infectious posterior uveitis, and new insights into its pathophysiology have paved the way for new therapeutic strategies. METHODS: This review summarises recent insights into the disease, its clinical manifestations and therapeutic options. The data have been gleaned from a PubMed search, which was conducted in August 2015 using the key term "ocular toxoplasmosis". RESULTS: A laboratory confirmation of the diagnosis serves as the basis for estimating the clinical burden of OT. This is more severe in South America than in Europe, due to the higher incidence of the more virulent New World parasitic strains. It is not yet possible to differentiate between acquired and congenital cases in most patients. However, in elderly individuals, clinical manifestations of acquired OT are more frequently encountered and in atypical forms. Although inflammation may initially be more pronounced in acquired than in congenital cases of OT, the final visual acuity is usually better and the risk of recurrence lower. Amongst the numerous therapeutic options, none is clearly superior. In immunocompromised individuals and in those with frequent recurrences, prophylactic measures should be considered. CONCLUSION: OT is still a potentially vision-threatening affection, namely in elderly individuals with acquired disease and in those patients harbouring the more aggressive New World strains of the parasite. Owing to the limitations in diagnostic sensitivity and therapeutic efficacy, treatment strategies have to be tailored to the individual needs.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1055/s-0041-111821

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Garweg, J.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Garweg, J.
Venue
Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde
Published
2016-04-26
Volume
233
Issue
04
Pages
534-539
ISSN
  • 0023-2165 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-3999
OpenAlex
W2343162650
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
ocular toxoplasmosis, Toxoplasma gondii, posterior uveitis, seroprevalence, congenital toxoplasmosis, acquired toxoplasmosis, immunocompromised patients, recurrence, prophylaxis, treatment options, visual acuity, elderly patients
MeSH terms
Antiprotozoal Agents, Blindness, Humans, Risk Factors, Toxoplasmosis, Ocular, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review